Comparison on Nanometrology: Nano 2—Step height

作者
Ludger Koenders,Robbert H. Bergmans,Joergen Garnaes,Jane Haycocks,N Korolev,Tomizo Kurosawa,Felix Meli,B. C. Park,Gong Peng,Gian Bartolo Picotto,E Prieto,Sheng Gao,B. Smereczyńska,Theodore V. Vorburger,Günter Wilkening
出处
期刊:Metrologia [IOP Publishing]
卷期号:40 (1A): 04001-04001 被引量:64
标识
DOI:10.1088/0026-1394/40/1a/04001
摘要

The ability to measure step height and to calibrate step height artefacts is of vital interest in nanometrology. On that score the WGDM7 decided in 1998 to include measurements of step heights in a series of comparisons on the field of nanometrology. The comparison about step height (NANO2) started in September 2000 with the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) as pilot laboratory. Fourteen national metrology institutes worldwide participated in this comparison. A set of five step height standards in the range from 7 nm to 800 nm was used for the comparison. The lateral size of the structures of the step height standards was chosen so that the height could be measured by different types of instruments, for example, interference microscopes, stylus instruments and scanning probe microscopes (SPM). The reference values were calculated as the weighted mean of all measurements that fulfilled the En < 1 criteria. Most of the results were in good agreement with the reference values. It is noticeable that the results obtained by different types of instruments are quite compatible. Also this comparison is the first comprehensive test of the reliability of SPM and their suitability for traceable measurements of step heights. Further it was shown that today step heights on samples can be measured with uncertainties in the sub-nanometre range. Differences in the calculation of the uncertainty depend on the types of instruments and on the users. For each class of instrument, e.g. SPM, it would be meaningful to homogenise these models. Hence the results of this comparison are of great importance in many respects. Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCL, according to the provisions of the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小马甲的应助被宋相甫采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
彭于晏的应助被看起来不太强采纳,获得10
1秒前
3秒前
Lonely樱木发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
罗喉完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
高高秋珊完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
acgangle完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
cc的应助被HJY采纳,获得10
3秒前
yangna完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
小丸子的读博日记完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
小马甲的应助被jeanian采纳,获得10
6秒前
Drtaoao完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
xing_xing的应助被孤独盼望采纳,获得20
6秒前
灰烬使者完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
无恙完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
老奈发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
seul完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
灌灌灌灌规划完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Wang发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
海东南发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
tly发布了新的文献求助40
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
宋相甫发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
华仔的应助被淡定难胜采纳,获得10
11秒前
图图完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Arbitrage Theory in Discrete and Continuous Time 500
Fortepian Chopina 400
A Silent Apostrophe:The Fayum Portraits 310
四川大学学位论文.郭瑞昂. 基于高压热扩散的n型磷掺杂金刚石半导体制备研究 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7830951
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9355437
关于积分的说明 20583741
捐赠科研通 7423774
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3336575
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2481101
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2357235