医学
粘膜切除术
结肠镜检查
外科
内窥镜检查
组织病理学
切除术
前瞻性队列研究
腺瘤性息肉
病变
放射科
内科学
结直肠癌
病理
癌症
作者
Neal Shahidi,Sunil Gupta,Anthony Whitfield,Sergei Vosko,Owen McKay,Oliver Cronin,Simmi Zahid,Nicholas G. Burgess,Michael J. Bourke
出处
期刊:Endoscopy
[Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)]
日期:2021-03-30
卷期号:54 (02): 173-177
被引量:5
摘要
Recognition of the post-endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) scar is critical for large (≥ 20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyp (LNPCP) management. The utility of intraluminal tattooing to facilitate scar identification is unknown.We evaluated the ability of simple easy-to-use optical evaluation criteria to detect the post-EMR scar, with or without tattoo placement, in a prospective observational cohort of LNPCPs referred for endoscopic resection. The primary outcome was scar identification, further stratified by lesion size (20-39 mm, ≥ 40 mm) and histopathology (adenomatous, serrated).1023 LNPCPs underwent both successful EMR and first surveillance colonoscopy (median size 35 mm, IQR 30-50 mm); 124 (12.1 %) had an existing tattoo or a tattoo placed at the index EMR. The post-EMR scar was identified in 1020 patients (99.7 %). The presence of a tattoo did not affect scar identification (100.0 % vs. 99.7 %; P > 0.99). There was no difference for LNPCPs 20-39 mm, LNPCPs ≥ 40 mm, adenomatous LNPCPs, and serrated LNPCPs (all P > 0.99).The post-EMR scar can be reliably identified with simple easy-to-use optical evaluation criteria, without the need for universal tattoo placement.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI