A Clinical Study of Comparative Efficacy of Nasal Steroid Spray versus Steroid in Combination with an Antihistamine Spray in Allergic Rhinitis

作者
Lanke Sowmya,Shanti Kolavali,Nagavardhan Reddy B.
出处
期刊:Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare [Level Up Business Center]
卷期号:6 (49): 3077-3080
标识
DOI:10.18410/jebmh/2019/644
摘要

BACKGROUND \nAllergic rhinitis is a common and debilitating disease that has a major effect on \nhealth related quality of life. In recent years, studies have been going on to \ndetermine if greater efficacy could be achieved with the intranasal antihistamine \nazelastine and the intranasal corticosteroid fluticasone propionate used \nconcurrently compared with the efficacy of each agent alone in allergic rhinitis. \nAccording to ARIA guidelines intranasal corticosteroids are the first line treatment \nof choice in allergic rhinitis. Hence, this study was undertaken to clinically evaluate \nthe efficacy of combination steroid and antihistamine nasal spray with nasal steroid \nspray alone in allergic rhinitis. \nMETHODS \n100 subjects aged between 12-65 years with symptoms of allergic rhinitis were \nchosen among outpatients attending Department of ENT. Patients who were \nwilling to participate in the study were evaluated by means of proper history taking \nwith the help of a proforma, clinical examination, diagnostic nasal endoscopy and \nrelevant laboratory investigations. Patients were given a simple questionnaire for \neasy gradation of complaints and individual symptoms are graded using four-point \nscale symptom evaluation score. Patients were sequentially randomized to receive \neither fluticasone in combination with azelastine nasal spray (group 1) and \nfluticasone nasal spray alone (group II). They were advised to use the spray with \na single sniff in each nostril twice a day. Patients were evaluated after one month \nand symptom chart was then filled using four-point scale symptom evaluation \nscore. \nRESULTS \nPercentage change of total symptom score in group I was superior (81%) \ncompared to only 75% in group II and there was statistically significant difference \nbetween two groups compared (0.004). Significant reduction in severity of \nindividual symptoms in group I compared to group II. \nCONCLUSIONS \nCombination nasal spray is superior in relieving moderate to severe symptoms in \npatients with allergic rhinitis compared to steroid nasal spray alone. \n

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
打打应助欢喜怀蝶采纳,获得10
2秒前
CipherSage应助信号采纳,获得10
2秒前
TAN90完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
慕青应助林新煌采纳,获得30
3秒前
哒丝萌德发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
3秒前
Cindy165发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
冷酷乘风发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
白露发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
molihuakai应助NguyenRe18采纳,获得30
5秒前
大模型应助小森采纳,获得10
5秒前
Allen发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
Hello应助萨芬撒采纳,获得10
6秒前
俊逸青筠完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
123123完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Peyton Why完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
缥缈嘉熙完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
超级尔白发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
时老发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
冷酷乘风完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
AL226完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
上官若男应助白露采纳,获得10
11秒前
对手发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
Oatmeal5888完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
挞挞不要胖完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
蓝天发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
香蕉觅云应助穆雨采纳,获得10
15秒前
Leucalypt发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
华仔应助玉儿采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
模型平均及其应用 900
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Structural Analysis 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7351771
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8963204
关于积分的说明 19041046
捐赠科研通 7001013
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3221374
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2385854
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2201812