Oral anticoagulants for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis

荟萃分析 心房颤动 冲程(发动机) 医学 重症监护医学 心脏病学 内科学 工程类 机械工程
作者
José A López-López,Jonathan A C Sterne,Howard H. Z. Thom,Julian P. T. Higgins,Aroon Dinesh Hingorani,George N. Okoli,Philippa A. Davies,Pritesh N. Bodalia,Peter A. Bryden,Nicky J. Welton,William Hollingworth,Deborah M Caldwell,Jelena Savović,Sofia Dias,Chris Salisbury,Diane Eaton,Annya Stephens-Boal,Reecha Sofat
出处
期刊: 卷期号:359: j5058-j5058 被引量:549
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.j5058
摘要

Abstract Objective To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness of direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with atrial fibrillation. Design Systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis. Data sources Medline, PreMedline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Published randomised trials evaluating the use of a DOAC, vitamin K antagonist, or antiplatelet drug for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Results 23 randomised trials involving 94 656 patients were analysed: 13 compared a DOAC with warfarin dosed to achieve a target INR of 2.0-3.0. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily (odds ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.94), dabigatran 150 mg twice daily (0.65, 0.52 to 0.81), edoxaban 60 mg once daily (0.86, 0.74 to 1.01), and rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (0.88, 0.74 to 1.03) reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared with warfarin. The risk of stroke or systemic embolism was higher with edoxaban 60 mg once daily (1.33, 1.02 to 1.75) and rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (1.35, 1.03 to 1.78) than with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily. The risk of all-cause mortality was lower with all DOACs than with warfarin. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily (0.71, 0.61 to 0.81), dabigatran 110 mg twice daily (0.80, 0.69 to 0.93), edoxaban 30 mg once daily (0.46, 0.40 to 0.54), and edoxaban 60 mg once daily (0.78, 0.69 to 0.90) reduced the risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin. The risk of major bleeding was higher with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily than apixaban 5 mg twice daily (1.33, 1.09 to 1.62), rivaroxaban 20 mg twice daily than apixaban 5 mg twice daily (1.45, 1.19 to 1.78), and rivaroxaban 20 mg twice daily than edoxaban 60 mg once daily (1.31, 1.07 to 1.59). The risk of intracranial bleeding was substantially lower for most DOACs compared with warfarin, whereas the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher with some DOACs than warfarin. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily was ranked the highest for most outcomes, and was cost effective compared with warfarin. Conclusions The network meta-analysis informs the choice of DOACs for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Several DOACs are of net benefit compared with warfarin. A trial directly comparing DOACs would overcome the need for indirect comparisons to be made through network meta-analysis. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD 42013005324.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
白圈圈完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
aajhajkahna的应助被哈基伟采纳,获得10
刚刚
燕迟发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
123564的应助被哈基伟采纳,获得10
刚刚
开朗的如蓉完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
无奈不平完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
H4cker发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
周青春偶像完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
LIU发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
大个的应助被Schade采纳,获得25
3秒前
Inahurry完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
zxinran0408发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
NexusExplorer的应助被Jagg_er采纳,获得10
4秒前
慕青的应助被慢慢采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
7秒前
lilili发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Lisa发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
lin完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
怕黑的老九完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
高贵的洋葱完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
窦函完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Q米嘛氏Q完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
12秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被泥巴采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
多米完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
共享精神的应助被郭佩杰采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
黎礼完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
瓜瓜发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
共享精神的应助被tomorrow采纳,获得10
15秒前
燕迟完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
刻苦以云完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
风禾尽起发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
kxy0311完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Spec 401: Standards for Jet Fuel Facility and Equipment Commissioning and Flushing at Airports, 2026.1 (Original Issue) 1000
Spec 103: Standard for Jet Fuel Quality Control at Airports, Revision 2026.1 1000
Mathematical models in hydrology 1000
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Erzählte Gnade 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8086965
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9500651
关于积分的说明 21420432
捐赠科研通 7658313
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3403461
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2532276
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2441933