散光
医学
折射误差
验光服务
单眼
眼科
多焦点人工晶状体
人工晶状体
对比度(视觉)
镜头(地质)
焦点深度(构造)
视力
光学
超声乳化术
物理
构造学
生物
古生物学
俯冲
作者
D. A. Black,Chandra Bala,Aixa Alarcón,Srividhya Vilupuru
出处
期刊:Eye
[Springer Nature]
日期:2024-04-05
卷期号:38 (S1): 15-20
被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41433-024-03040-1
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the tolerance to refractive errors of a new purely refractive extended depth of focus (EDF) intraocular lens (IOL), TECNIS PureSee™ IOL, using preclinical and clinical metrics. METHODS: Preclinical evaluation included computer simulations of visual acuity (sVA) and dysphotopsia profile of different IOL designs (refractive EDF, diffractive EDF, multifocal, standard, and enhanced monofocals) using an appropriate eye model with and without ±0.50 D defocus and/or +0.75 D of astigmatism. Patients bilaterally implanted with a refractive EDF (Model ZEN00V) or an enhanced monofocal (Model ICB00) IOL from a prospective, randomized study were included. At the 6-month postoperative visit, uncorrected and corrected distance vision (UDVA and CDVA), visual symptoms, satisfaction and dependency on glasses were evaluated in a subgroup of patients with absolute residual refractive error of >0.25 D in one or both eyes. RESULTS: In the presence of defocus and astigmatism, sVA was comparable for all except the multifocal IOL design. The refractive EDF was more tolerant to myopic outcomes and maintained a monofocal-like dysphotopsia profile with defocus. Binocular logMAR UDVA was -0.03 ± 0.08 for ZEN00V and -0.02 ± 0.11 for ICB00. 100% ZEN00V and 97% ICB00 patients did not need glasses and were satisfied with their distance vision. Monocular CDVA, contrast sensitivity and visual symptoms were also similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes of the refractive EDF IOL demonstrated high quality distance vision and dysphotopsia comparable to a monofocal IOL, even in the presence of refractive error, thus matching the design expectations of the EDF IOL.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI