Prospective evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and optimal biomarker enrichment strategy for nangibotide, a TREM-1 inhibitor, in patients with septic shock (ASTONISH): a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2b trial

医学 感染性休克 安慰剂 生物标志物 败血症 人口 临床试验 内科学 重症监护 休克(循环) 重症监护医学 病理 生物化学 化学 替代医学 环境卫生
作者
Bruno François,Simon Lambden,Tom Fivez,Sébastien Gibot,Marc Derive,Jean‐Marie Grouin,Margarita Salcedo‐Magguilli,Jérémie Lemarie,Nicolas De Schryver,Ville Jalkanen,Tarik Hicheur,Jean–Jacques Garaud,Valérie Cuvier,Ricard Ferrer,Morten H. Bestle,Ville Pettilä,Jean‐Paul Mira,Camille Bouisse,Emmanuelle Mercier,Joris Vermassen
出处
期刊:The Lancet Respiratory Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:11 (10): 894-904 被引量:43
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2213-2600(23)00158-3
摘要

Activation of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) pathway is associated with septic shock outcomes. Data suggest that modulation of this pathway in patients with activated TREM-1 might improve survival. Soluble TREM-1 (sTREM-1), a potential mechanism-based biomarker, might facilitate enrichment of patient selection in clinical trials of nangibotide, a TREM-1 modulator. In this phase 2b trial, we aimed to confirm the hypothesis that TREM1 inhibition might improve outcomes in patients with septic shock.This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial assessed the efficacy and safety of two different doses of nangibotide compared with placebo, and aimed to identify the optimum treatment population, in patients across 42 hospitals with medical, surgical, or mixed intensive care units (ICUs) in seven countries. Non-COVID-19 patients (18-85 years) meeting the standard definition of septic shock, with documented or suspected infection (lung, abdominal, or urinary [in patients ≥65 years]), were eligible within 24 h of vasopressor initiation for the treatment of septic shock. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to intravenous nangibotide 0·3 mg/kg per h (low-dose group), nangibotide 1·0 mg/kg per h (high-dose group), or matched placebo, using a computer-generated block randomisation scheme (block size 3). Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Patients were grouped according to sTREM-1 concentrations at baseline (established from sepsis observational studies and from phase 2a change to data) into high sTREM-1 (≥ 400 pg/mL). The primary outcome was the mean difference in total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score from baseline to day 5 in the low-dose and high-dose groups compared with placebo, measured in the predefined high sTREM-1 (≥ 400 pg/mL) population and in the overall modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included all-cause 28-day mortality, safety, pharmacokinetics, and evaluation of the relationship between TREM-1 activation and treatment response. This study is registered with EudraCT, 2018-004827-36, and Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04055909.Between Nov 14, 2019, and April 11, 2022, of 402 patients screened, 355 were included in the main analysis (116 in the placebo group, 118 in the low-dose group, and 121 in the high-dose group). In the preliminary high sTREM-1 population (total 253 [71%] of 355; placebo 75 [65%] of 116; low-dose 90 [76%] of 118; high-dose 88 [73%] of 121), the mean difference in SOFA score from baseline to day 5 was 0·21 (95% CI -1·45 to 1·87, p=0·80) in the low-dose group and 1·39 (-0·28 to 3·06, p=0·104) in the high-dose group versus placebo. In the overall population, the difference in SOFA score from baseline to day 5 between the placebo group and low-dose group was 0·20 (-1·09 to 1·50; p=0·76),and between the placebo group and the high-dose group was 1·06 (-0·23 to 2·35, p=0·108). In the predefined high sTREM-1 cutoff population, 23 (31%) patients in the placebo group, 35 (39%) in the low-dose group, and 25 (28%) in the high-dose group had died by day 28. In the overall population, 29 (25%) patients in the placebo, 38 (32%) in the low-dose, and 30 (25%) in the high-dose group had died by day 28. The number of treatment-emergent adverse events (111 [96%] patients in the placebo group, 113 [96%] in the low-dose group, and 115 [95%] in the high-dose group) and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (28 [24%], 26 [22%], and 31 [26%]) was similar between all three groups. High-dose nangibotide led to a clinically relevant improvement in SOFA score (of two points or more) from baseline to day 5 over placebo in those with higher cutoff concentrations (≥532 pg/mL) of sTREM-1 at baseline. Low dose nangibotide displayed a similar pattern with lower magnitude of effect across all cutoff values.This trial did not achieve the primary outcome of improvement in SOFA score at the predefined sTREM-1 value. Future studies are needed to confirm the benefit of nangibotide at higher concentrations of TREM-1 activation.Inotrem.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
LINGYUAN1991发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
星辰大海应助番茄酱采纳,获得10
4秒前
jyt完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
中工完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
202483067完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
花开富贵完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
Panini完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
小新新完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
如意的新蕾完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
hwl26完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
一只滦完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
HK完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
倪妮完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
噢耶发布了新的文献求助20
37秒前
含糊的无声完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
出厂价完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
Diego完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
SSDlk完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
所所应助曾珍采纳,获得10
44秒前
安然完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
Yi完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
凶狠的白桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
汤圆完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
wlscj给nini的求助进行了留言
50秒前
浮游应助噢耶采纳,获得10
50秒前
时尚的康乃馨完成签到 ,获得积分10
50秒前
skmaple完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
王继完成签到,获得积分10
54秒前
卡片完成签到,获得积分10
54秒前
Beverly完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
dldldl完成签到,获得积分10
57秒前
sheep完成签到,获得积分10
57秒前
胡思乱想完成签到,获得积分10
58秒前
hahaha6789y完成签到,获得积分10
58秒前
噢耶完成签到,获得积分20
59秒前
量子咸鱼K完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
票票完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Fermented Coffee Market 2000
合成生物食品制造技术导则,团体标准,编号:T/CITS 396-2025 1000
The Leucovorin Guide for Parents: Understanding Autism’s Folate 1000
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life 4th Edition 500
Comparing natural with chemical additive production 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5246548
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4411578
关于积分的说明 13729698
捐赠科研通 4282461
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2349793
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1346840
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1306181