Patient Perceptions on the Use of Gender-Inclusive Language in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Qualitative Study [ID 2683479]

INTRODUCTION: This qualitative study explored how gender-inclusive language affects patients receiving care from obstetrician–gynecologists. METHODS: Purposive sampling was used to ensure a diverse population of participants. Semistructured video interviews were used to explore perceptions of gender-inclusive language. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed via ATLAS.ti. RESULTS: Fourteen interviews were completed. Fifty-seven percent of participants were 18–30 years old. Fourteen percent of participants were over 50 years old. Twenty-nine percent of participants identified as a gender other than female. Terms including “maternity,” “women's health,” and “chestfeeding,” elicited varied responses. Gender inclusivity statements made by national obstetrics and gynecology organizations were variably perceived as either appropriate, needing revision, or harmful to gender-diverse patients. Predominant themes include the following: 1) affirming language and inclusiveness are critical, “it could definitely … save somebody's life just by making them comfortable”; 2) varied patient experiences within health care should be respected; 3) there is a preference towards individualized language over neutral language, “It's good to be more inclusive in a way that doesn't diminish the importance of the individual person”; 4) perceived threats of inclusive language include medicalization of language, lack of recognition of women's rights efforts, and alienation of conservative individuals who may disagree with language changes, “I don't want … care that mostly affects cis-women to become … obscured or … diminished.” CONCLUSION: The transition towards gender-inclusive language in obstetrics and gynecology health care is pivotal. Balancing inclusivity, individuality, and historical terminology is a complex task that requires thoughtful input from diverse populations.