Iterative Image Reconstruction Techniques for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison with Traditional Filtered Back Projection in Vitro and in Vivo

作者
Andreas Schindler,Rozemarijn Vliegenthart,U. Joseph Schoepf,Philipp Blanke,Ullrich Ebersberger,Young Jun Cho,Thomas Allmendinger,Sebastian Vogt,Rainer Raupach,Christian Fink,Tobias Saam,Fabian Bamberg,Konstantin Nikolaou,Paul Apfaltrer
出处
期刊:Radiology [Radiological Society of North America]
卷期号:270 (2): 387-393 被引量:63
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.13130233
摘要

PURPOSE: To investigate in vitro and in vivo the use of image-based and raw data-based iterative reconstruction algorithms for quantification of coronary artery calcium by using the Agatston score and subsequent cardiac risk stratification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro data were obtained by using a moving anthropomorphic cardiac phantom containing calcium inserts of different concentrations and sizes. With institutional review board approval and HIPAA compliance, coronary calcium imaging data of 110 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 58.2 years ± 9.8; 48 men) were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS), and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). Image noise was measured and the Agatston score was obtained for all reconstructions. Assignment to Agatston scores and percentile-based cardiac risk categories was compared. Statistical analysis included the Cohen κ coefficient and Friedman and Wilcoxon testing. RESULTS: In vitro, mean Agatston scores ± standard deviation for FBP (638.9 ± 9.6), IRIS (622.7 ± 15.2), and SAFIRE (631.4 ± 17.6) were comparable (P = .30). The smallest phantom calcifications were more frequently detected when iterative reconstruction techniques were used. The Agatston scores in the patient cohort were not significantly different among FBP, IRIS, and SAFIRE in paired comparisons (median Agatston score [25th and 75th percentiles]: 76.0 [20.6, 243.9], 76.4 [22, 249.3], and 75.7 [21.5, 49.1], respectively; P = .20 each). Comparison of categorization based on Agatston score percentiles showed excellent agreement for both IRIS and SAFIRE with FBP (κ = 0.975 [0.942-1.00] and κ = 0.963 [0.922-1.00], respectively). The mean effective dose was 1.02 mSv ± 0.51. Mean image noise was significantly (P < .001) higher with FBP than that with iterative reconstructions. CONCLUSION: In comparison with FBP, iterative reconstruction techniques do not have a profound effect on the reproducible quantification of coronary calcium according to Agatston score and subsequent cardiac risk classification, although risk reclassification may occur in a small subset of subjects.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
舒适采梦关注了科研通微信公众号
刚刚
科研猫完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
微笑的巧蕊完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
清爽的人英完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
DL_zhai完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
爱米粒725完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
机智雅山完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
学术文献互助完成签到,获得积分0
29秒前
lianxin完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
小悦完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
华理附院孙文博完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
HuanChen完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
abtitw完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
黄景滨完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
梁芯完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
HuangShuting完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
耍酷的冷雪完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
Windsyang完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
1分钟前
yhjyhjyhj完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
孤独晓绿完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
碧蓝复天发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
percy完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
蟑先生完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
lorentzh完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
神通广大的MOMO完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
LMF完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
十五完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
白白不喽完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
小金牛完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
陈总完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Ali应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
天天快乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
自動車の空力技術 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7778408
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9318783
关于积分的说明 20366079
捐赠科研通 7365532
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3319203
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2467152
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2334630