Comparison of strategies for vascular ACCESS closure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: the ACCESS-TAVI randomized trial

医学 止血 纤维接头 随机对照试验 外科 临床终点 置信区间 血管闭合器 内科学
作者
Tobias Rheude,Hendrik Ruge,Niklas Altaner,Costanza Pellegrini,Héctor Alvarez Covarrubias,N. Patrick Mayr,Salvatore Cassese,Sebastian Kufner,Yousuke Taniguchi,Christian Thilo,Markus Klos,Magdalena Erlebach,Simon Schneider,Martin Jurisic,Karl‐Ludwig Laugwitz,Rüdiger Lange,Heribert Schunkert,Adnan Kastrati,Markus Krane,Erion Xhepa
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:46 (7): 635-645 被引量:38
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae784
摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data from randomized trials investigating different access closure strategies after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) remain scarce. In this study, two vascular closure device (VCD) strategies to achieve haemostasis after TF-TAVI were compared. METHODS: The ACCESS-TAVI (Comparison of Strategies for Vascular ACCESS Closure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) is a prospective, multicentre trial in which patients undergoing TF-TAVI were randomly assigned to a strategy with a combined suture-/plug-based VCD strategy (suture/plug group) using one ProGlide™/ProStyle™ (Abbott Vascular) and one Angio-Seal® (Terumo) vs. a suture-based VCD strategy (suture-only group) using two ProGlides™/ProStyles™. The primary endpoint was a composite of major or minor access site-related vascular complications during index hospitalization according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. Key secondary endpoints included time to haemostasis, bleeding type ≥ 2, and all-cause mortality over 30 days. RESULTS: Between September 2022 and April 2024, 454 patients were randomized. The primary endpoint occurred in 27% (62/230) in the suture/plug group and 54% (121/224) in the suture-only group [relative risk .55 (95% confidence interval: .44, .68); P < .001]. Time to haemostasis was significantly shorter in the suture/plug group compared with the suture-only group (108 ± 208 s vs. 206 ± 171 s; P < .001). At 30 days, bleeding type ≥ 2 occurred less often in the suture/plug group compared with the suture-only group [6.2% vs. 12.1%, relative risk .66 (.43, 1.02); P = .032], with no significant difference in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to the composite of major or minor access site-related vascular complications, a combined suture-/plug-based VCD strategy was superior to a suture-based VCD strategy for vascular access closure in patients undergoing TF-TAVI.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Ava应助108采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
15发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
润柏海完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
xx发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
科研通AI2S应助合适不悔采纳,获得10
6秒前
小马甲应助FunF采纳,获得10
7秒前
无花果应助mayyyyyy采纳,获得10
7秒前
YuT完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
龚成明发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
沐沐发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
田様应助PoorResearch采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
柳相赫完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
Frank发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
mingjingbingying完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
feitian201861发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
108发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
yuyu发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
cloner发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
白云顶应助ming2026采纳,获得10
16秒前
消逝发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
Sunshine发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Ava应助旺仔不甜采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
wang发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
2026年中国辛酸癸酸聚乙二醇甘油酯行业市场现状调查及投资机会研判报告 1000
模型平均及其应用 900
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
Évora na Idade Média 555
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 550
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7345566
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8957813
关于积分的说明 19021817
捐赠科研通 6996856
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3219980
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2384901
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2200252