护理部
人文主义
临床判断
多学科方法
心理学
过程(计算)
认知
护士教育
医学教育
梅德林
医学
计算机科学
社会学
政治学
操作系统
社会科学
神经科学
医学物理学
法学
作者
Philip Dickison,Katie Anne Adamson,Kathie Lasater
标识
DOI:10.3928/01484834-20190122-03
摘要
Sound nursing clinical judgment is at the core of competent and safe client care. New graduate nurses face increasing challenges that underscore the importance of investigating how nurse educators teach and measure nursing students' abilities to make clinical judgments. This article presents the National Council of State Boards of Nursing-Clinical Judgment Model (NCSBN-CJM) and discusses the use of the model.A multidisciplinary team conducted a qualitative comparative analysis of the relationships between the NCSBN-CJM and the three leading frameworks for providing clinical judgment education to entry-level nurses.The NCSBN-CJM aligns with the Information-Processing Model and the Intuitive-Humanistic Model. The NCSBN-CJM also can be used to assess the Dual Process Reasoning Theory.The NCSBN-CJM can assist nurse educators in designing effective tools for assessing clinical judgment by helping them target specific cognitive operations. This flexible model expresses the complexities associated with decision making in a simplified manner to enable better measurement of clinical judgment. [J Nurs Educ. 2019;58(2):72-78.].
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI