失调
厚壁菌
拟杆菌
拟杆菌
肠道菌群
克罗恩病
生物
微生物学
双歧杆菌
放线菌门
真细菌
蛋白质细菌
微生物群
免疫学
节点2
疾病
医学
乳酸菌
病理
生物信息学
遗传学
16S核糖体RNA
细菌
作者
Manasvini Markandey,Aditya Bajaj,Sudheer K. Vuyyuru,Srikant Mohta,Mukesh Kumar Singh,M Verma,Suraj Kumar,Bhaskar Kante,P Kumar,Govind Makharia,Saurabh Kedia,Vineet Ahuja
标识
DOI:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab232.830
摘要
Abstract Background Crohn’s disease (CD) and intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) are chronic granulomatous inflammatory disorders characterized by a compromised mucosal immunity. Even with diverging etiologies, CD and ITB presents an uncanny resemblance in clinical manifestation resulting in diagnostic dilemma. The gut microbiota regulates myriad of gut mucosal immunological processes. Present study aims to decipher gut microbial dysbiosis in the two disorders and utilize the CD and ITB-specific gut dysbiosis to construct a machine learning (ML)-based predictive model, which can aid in their differential diagnosis. Methods Fecal samples from healthy controls (n=12) and from patients with CD (n=23) and ITB (n=25) were subjected to 16S (V3-V4) amplicon sequencing. Processing of raw reads, construction of ASV feature tables, diversity, core microbiome analysis and ML classifier construction was done using QIIME2-2021.4. Differential abundance analysis (DAA) between the groups was carried out using Deseq2, after adjusting for the subject-specific confounders. Results The α and β diversity indices in CD and ITB groups were significantly reduced than HC group (p = 0.011 and 0.012 resp.), with no significant differences between the two diseases (Fig.1A, 1B). On comparison with HC, CD and ITB groups showed reduction in members of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, with enhancement of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria (Fig.1C and 1D). DAA (FDR q <0.1, FC >2.5) between CD and ITB groups revealed expansion of Succinivibrio dextrinisolvens, Odoribacter splanchnicus, Megasphaera massiliensis, Bacteroides uniformis and B.xylanisolvens in CD group, while Clostridium sp., Haemophilus parainfluenzae and Bifidobacterium sp. were elevated in ITB (Fig.2A). Random Forest-based ML model constructed on the basis of raw microbiome reads and using 80% of the samples to train the model, showed predictive accuracy of 0.78 (AUC=93%). (Fig.2B) Conclusion Our study shows that CD and ITB witnesses significant changes in gut microbial structure. With no significant differences in microbial diversity between two diseases, the signature of gut dysbiosis is distinct between CD and ITB. Exploitation of these differences to construct ML models can potentiate differential diagnosis of CD and ITB.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI