官僚主义
情境伦理学
代表性启发
代表(政治)
论证(复杂分析)
构造(python库)
政治学
实证经济学
法律与经济学
社会心理学
公共行政
社会学
心理学
法学
经济
计算机科学
政治
生物化学
化学
程序设计语言
作者
John J. Hindera,Cheryl D. Young
标识
DOI:10.1177/106591299805100305
摘要
This research extends our knowledge of the relationship between passive representative bureaucracy and active representative bureaucracy (Mosher 1968). We utilize data from the United States Equal Employment Opportu nity Commission (EEOC) to posit and test a theory of situational thresholds. Our theory is premised on the argument that Meier's (1993b) construct, criti cal mass, constitutes a particular example of a more general concept, situ ational threshold (Campbell 1963). We present evidence that three situational thresholds exist in the EEOC bureaucratic environment which determine the nature of the relationship between passive representativeness and active rep resentation : when a critical mass is reached; when a group constitutes a plu rality ; and when a group constitutes a majority In toto, these three situational thresholds delineate four distinct social environments in which active repre sentation transpires. Our findings strongly suggest that the relationship be tween passive representation and active representation is fundamentally different for each type of bureaucratic environment.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI