European evidence based consensus for endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease

炎症性肠病 协商一致会议 医学 内窥镜检查 胃肠病学 疾病 内科学
作者
Vito Annese,Marco Daperno,Matthew D. Rutter,Aurélien Amiot,Peter Bossuyt,James E. East,Marc Ferrante,Martín Götz,Κωνσταντίνος Κατσάνος,Ralf Kießlich,Íngrid Ordás,Alessandro Repici,Bruno Rosa,Shaji Sebastian,Torsten Kucharzik,Rami Eliakim
出处
期刊:Journal of Crohn's and Colitis [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:7 (12): 982-1018 被引量:766
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.crohns.2013.09.016
摘要

Endoscopy plays an essential role in the diagnosis, management, prognosis, and surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but surprisingly there are few available guidelines.1,2 This prompted the ECCO Guidelines Committee (GuiCom) members to promote a Consensus on the appropriate indication and application of different endoscopic modalities in IBD. Since the development of guidelines is an expensive and time-consuming process, this Consensus may help to avoid duplication of effort in the future. It may also identify issues where the evidence is lacking and controlled studies are awaited. The strategy to reach the Consensus involved five steps: 1. Two members of the GuiCom (VA and RE) identified four main topics: a) Diagnosis and follow-up; b) Score of endoscopic activity; c) Small bowel endoscopy; and d) Surveillance. During 2012 a call for participants to the Guideline was made to ECCO members. In addition, expert endoscopists recognised for their active research in the field were invited. Participants were selected by the Guicom and four working groups were created. Each working group had a chair (VA, MD, MT, and RE), two ECCO members including young members (Y-ECCO) and one experienced endoscopist. For the development of the guideline, relevant questions on separate topics were devised by the chairmen and their working parties. The questions were focused on current practice and areas of controversy. Participants of the Consensus process were asked to answer the questions based on evidence from the literature as well as their experience (Delphi procedure)3; 2. The working parties working in parallel performed a systematic literature search of their topic with the appropriate key words using Medline/Pubmed and the Cochrane database, as well as other relevant sources; 3. Provisional guideline statements on their topic were then written by the chairmen. These were circulated and commented on first by working party members and …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
ljjxd完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
大眼睛土豆完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
WXK@945完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
QQQ发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
夏末未央完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
初小花完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
WN发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Eho发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
喵总完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
estk完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
jialin完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
zhq发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
舒心沛蓝发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
xiaohuang完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
啵妞完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
李健的小迷弟应助estk采纳,获得10
14秒前
奋斗的盼柳完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
科研通AI5应助huyz采纳,获得10
18秒前
卡卡西应助ZZzz采纳,获得20
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
六沉发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
23秒前
开朗曲奇发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
半个柚子完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
赘婿应助Ade阿德采纳,获得10
25秒前
酷酷的夏旋完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
77发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
莫问今生完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
橙尘尘完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
李健的小迷弟应助小莫采纳,获得10
28秒前
咕噜咕噜发布了新的文献求助30
28秒前
高分求助中
Chinesen in Europa – Europäer in China: Journalisten, Spione, Studenten 500
Arthur Ewert: A Life for the Comintern 500
China's Relations With Japan 1945-83: The Role of Liao Chengzhi // Kurt Werner Radtke 500
Two Years in Peking 1965-1966: Book 1: Living and Teaching in Mao's China // Reginald Hunt 500
Epigenetic Drug Discovery 500
Hardness Tests and Hardness Number Conversions 300
Knowledge management in the fashion industry 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3816942
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3360342
关于积分的说明 10407653
捐赠科研通 3078322
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1690694
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 814001
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 767958