医学
倾向得分匹配
胃肠道出血
抗血栓
华法林
内科学
逻辑回归
药品
绝对风险降低
因果推理
抗凝剂
选择偏差
大出血
选择(遗传算法)
混淆
标签外使用
队列研究
外科
风险评估
回顾性队列研究
药物流行病学
抗凝药
研究设计
血小板聚集抑制剂
重症监护医学
低风险
拜瑞妥
胃肠道出血
下消化道出血
临床试验
梅德林
随机对照试验
达比加群
推论
维生素K拮抗剂
优势比
抗血小板药物
弗雷明翰风险评分
不利影响
糖尿病
作者
Prajwal M. Pradhan,Erich Kummerfeld,Steven Johnson,Gyorgy Simon,Terrence Adam
标识
DOI:10.1080/17425255.2026.2686707
摘要
BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) impact patient safety. This study used causal inference framework to examine the association between interacting drugs, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), antiplatelets, warfarin and incident gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from Merative MarketScan commercial and Medicare claims (2013-2021), enriched with Micromedex data were used. Adults (≥18 years) with antithrombotics claims were included. Incident GI bleeding was primary outcome. Adaptive post-double selection using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was implemented for variable selection. Following propensity score matching, final estimates were obtained from weighted logistic models. RESULTS: = 0.006). None of the interacting drugs reached statistical significance, bleeding risk was driven by age (>70 years) and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Within a causal inference framework, DOACs exposure was associated with less risk of GI bleeding compared to antiplatelets. However, class-level grouping may mask individual drug-specific metabolic risks. IRB: The protocol (STUDY00016941) was reviewed and received exemption determination by the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI