Physical therapy in addition to occlusal splint in myogenic temporomandibular disorders: A randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background Myogenic temporomandibular disorders (M‐TMD) commonly involve occlusal splint (OS) therapy and musculoskeletal physiotherapy (MPT). Objectives To compare the effects of combining OS with MPT and education (EG) against OS and education (CG), in chronic M‐TMD patients. Methods In this double‐blind randomised controlled trial, 62 participants were assigned to either EG or CG. The primary outcomes, pain levels at rest (VAS rest), maximum oral opening (VAS open) and during chewing (VAS chew), were measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in cm. The secondary outcome was the range of motion (ROM) for maximum oral opening. Both interventions lasted 3 months, with outcomes assessed at baseline (T0), post‐treatment (T1) and 3 months post‐treatment (T2). Results Intention‐to‐treat analysis revealed significant improvements favouring EG (VAS rest = −1.50 cm [CI 95% : −2.67, −0.32], p = .04; VAS open = −2.00 cm [CI 95% : −3.23, −0.75], p < .01; VAS chew = −1.71 cm [CI 95% : −2.90, −0.52], p = .01; ROM = 4.61 [CI 95% : 0.93, 8.30], p = .04). Additionally, VAS measures were influenced by follow‐up times (VAS rest = −0.73 cm [CI 95% : −1.30, −0.17], p = 0.03; VAS open = −0.97 cm [CI 95% : −1.57, −0.37], p < .01; VAS chew = −1.15 cm [CI 95% : −1.73, −0.58], p < .01). At T1, EG demonstrated higher number of responders compared to CG for VAS open ( χ 2 (1) = 4.39, p = .04) and VAS chew ( χ 2 (1) = 11.58, p < .01). Conclusion Adding MPT to education and OS yields better outcomes in terms of pain reduction and ROM improvement, in chronic M‐TMD. Trial Registration Number NCT03726060.