预加载
医学
心脏病学
内科学
后负荷
血压
袖口
舒张期
收缩性
心力衰竭
心室压
血流动力学
外科
作者
David M. Shavelle,Derek Rinderknecht,Weiwei Jin,W. Brian Chiu,A Krupa,Niema M. Pahlevan,Kendra Cook,Farrell O. Mendelsohn,Thomas Cawthon,Ryan Reeves,Richard McNamara,Ryan D. Madder,Hoang Quan Nguyen,Sarah Elsayed,John Bahadorani,Daniel H Lamont,Tae Y Yang,Steven R. Bailey
出处
期刊:Circulation
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2023-11-07
卷期号:148 (Suppl_1)
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1161/circ.148.suppl_1.16544
摘要
Introduction: Measurement of left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is an established diagnostic method to evaluate all types of heart failure (HF). Invasive measurement of LVEDP requires an in-hospital procedure which limits accessibility. A noninvasive technique for detecting elevated LVEDP would significantly improve the diagnosis of HF, particularly in the outpatient setting. Herein we present the results of a multicenter study to validate a noninvasive system to detect elevated LVEDP. Methods: The Vivio System includes a modified blood pressure cuff and single lead ECG to capture brachial artery waveforms to assess preload, afterload and contractility. A model was created to identify patients with elevated LVEDP (> 18mmHg). 728 patients were enrolled from 7 medical centers in the USA. All patients were referred for coronary angiography and left heart catheterization for clinical indications. A group of 321 patients with no known significant health problems were enrolled as a control group. Invasive LVEDP measurements were conducted using Millar catheters. The control group was assumed to have a LVEDP = 10 mmHg. The training dataset (n = 262, mean age 45 ± 19 yrs; 54% male) contained 101 patients with LVEDP measurements (n = 44 with LVEDP > 18 mmHg) and 161 controls. The validation dataset (n = 155, mean age 46 ± 21 yrs; 62% male) contained 75 patients with LVEDP measurements (n = 40 with LVEDP > 18 mmHg) and 80 controls. Results: Leave-one-out cross-validation on the training dataset yielded a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70 - 0.93) and a specificity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79 - 0.89). The validation dataset showed a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64 - 0.91) and a specificity of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75 - 0.90). Figure 1 shows the overall classification performance. Conclusion: The Vivio System can accurately detect elevated LVEDP and has the potential to significantly improve early detection of HF in the outpatient setting.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI