Predicting the properties of concrete incorporating graphene nano platelets by experimental and machine learning approaches

Modern infrastructure requirements necessitate structural components with improved durability and strength properties. The incorporation of nanomaterials (NMs) into concrete emerges as a viable strategy to enhance both the durability and strength of the concrete. Nevertheless, the complexities inherent in these nanoscale cementitious composites are notably intricate. Traditional regression models face constraints in comprehensively capturing these intricate compositions. Thus, posing challenges in delivering precise and dependable estimations. Therefore, the current study utilized three machine learning (ML) methods, including artificial neural network (ANN), gene expression programming (GEP), and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), in conjunction with experimental investigation to study the effect of the integration of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) on the electrical resistivity (ER) and compressive strength (CS) of concrete containing GNPs. Concrete containing GNPs demonstrated an improved fractional change in resistivity (FCR) and strength. The experimental measures depict that strength enhancement was notable at GNP concentrations of 0.05% and 0.1%, showcasing increases of 13.23% and 16.58%, respectively. Simultaneously, the highest observed FCR change reached −12.19% and −13%, respectively. The prediction efficacy of the three models proved to be outstanding in forecasting the characteristics of concrete containing GNPs. For CS, the GEP, ANN, and ANFIS models demonstrated impressive correlation coefficient (R) values of 0.974, 0.963, and 0.954, respectively. For electrical resistivity, the GEP, ANN, and ANFIS models exhibited high R-values of 0.999, 0.995, and 0.987, respectively. The comparative analysis of the models revealed that the GEP model delivered precise predictions for both ER and CS. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the GEP-CS model demonstrated a 14.51% reduction compared to the ANN-CS model and a substantial 48.15% improvement over the ANFIS-CS model. Similarly, the ANN-CS model displayed an MAE that was 38.14% lower compared to the ANFIS-CS model. Moreover, the MAE of the GEP-ER model demonstrated a 56.80% reduction compared to the ANN-CS model and a substantial 82.47% improvement over the ANFIS-CS model. The Shapley Additive explanation (SHAP) analysis provided that curing age exhibited the highest SHAP score. Thus, indicating its predominant contribution to CS prediction. In predicting ER, the graphene content exhibited the highest SHAP score, signifying its predominant contribution to ER estimation. This study highlights ML's accuracy in predicting the properties of concrete with graphene nanoplatelets, offering a fast and cost-effective alternative to time-consuming experiments.