The role of empathy in trolley problems and variants: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract The role of empathy in morality is a subject of ongoing scientific debate due to the lack of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses on this topic. To address this gap, we conducted a PRISMA‐based systematic quantitative review to investigate the role of empathy in moral judgements, decision‐making, and inclinations using trolley problems and variants, which are popular types of moral dilemmas that explore utilitarianism and deontology. We searched for articles in four databases (PsycINFO, Pubmed, WorldWideScience, and Scopus) and performed citation searches. Out of 661 records, we selected 34 that studied the associations between empathy and moral judgements, moral decision‐making, and/or moral inclinations. Six meta‐analyses and systematic reviews of these records consistently showed small to moderate associations between affective empathy and these moral parameters, particularly in personal moral dilemmas involving intentional harm (although some approaches highlighted more complex associations between these parameters). Regarding other empathy domains, most studies found limited or insignificant links between cognitive empathy domains and moral judgements, decision‐making, and inclinations. We discuss the nuances and implications of these results.