Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

医学 脊柱侧凸 腰椎 射线照相术 矢状面 外科 物理疗法 放射科
作者
Peggy Guey-Chi Chen,Michael D. Daubs,Sigurd Berven,Laura Raaen,Ashaunta T. Anderson,Steven M. Asch,Teryl K. Nuckols
出处
期刊:Spine [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:41 (10): 910-918 被引量:51
标识
DOI:10.1097/brs.0000000000001392
摘要

The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method is a well-established means of developing criteria for assessing the appropriateness of surgery in specific subpopulations. It involves a systematic review of the literature and ratings by a multidisciplinary panel of national experts.To evaluate the appropriateness of surgical interventions for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS), including identifying clinical characteristics that influence when surgery is inappropriate, appropriate, or necessary, and which procedures are preferable.DLS presents with diverse clinical symptoms and radiographic findings. Variability exists in both nonoperative and operative management. The appropriateness of surgery, and of specific surgical procedures, has not been defined for this important pathology of the aging spine.We selected a panel of 11 experts, including surgical specialists from multiple disciplines. Next, we systematically reviewed relevant literature. Finally, in a three-round, modified-Delphi process, panelists rated the appropriateness and necessity of five different surgical procedures (dependent variables) on a nine-point scale for 260 different clinical scenarios that stratified patients according to age, medical comorbidities, symptoms, signs, and radiographic variables (independent variables).The 59 eligible studies identified via the systematic review were generally small or used weak designs. Panelists judged that surgery was generally appropriate for patients with at least moderate symptoms and larger or progressive deformities, moderate spinal or foraminal stenosis, or sagittal plane imbalance. Surgery was generally inappropriate for mild symptoms and smaller stable deformities, without sagittal imbalance or moderate stenosis, particularly among patients with advanced age and multiple comorbidities. For patients with larger or progressive deformities, imbalance, or severe multilevel stenosis, more extensive fusion and deformity correction procedures were generally preferred.Defining the appropriateness of surgery for patients with DLS will be useful to improve evidence-based clinical decision making as well as the consistency and quality of care for patients with DLS.3.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
chongchong2022完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
hengzhi完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
ShuangqingYE发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
二零发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
郭佳完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
大个应助翁依波采纳,获得10
12秒前
joy完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
动听夏兰发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
haha完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
喜悦的开山完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Yang发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
充电宝应助yeqing采纳,获得10
16秒前
莫羽倾尘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
123456发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
west完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
gg完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
个性的紫菜应助蔡小葵采纳,获得10
19秒前
大模型应助吴祎鸽采纳,获得10
21秒前
哎呦喂完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
丘比特应助娟娟子要加油采纳,获得10
21秒前
周军浩发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
Ava应助碎米花采纳,获得10
23秒前
25秒前
bsnc发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
27秒前
27秒前
carbon-dots完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
30秒前
qhy发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
斯文败类应助科研人才采纳,获得10
31秒前
NexusExplorer应助二零采纳,获得10
33秒前
梅豪发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
Kyr发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
情怀应助单身的衬衫采纳,获得10
35秒前
37秒前
高分求助中
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Plesiosaur extinction cycles; events that mark the beginning, middle and end of the Cretaceous 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 440
Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between blood lipids and venous thromboembolism 400
薩提亞模式團體方案對青年情侶輔導效果之研究 400
3X3 Basketball: Everything You Need to Know 310
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2386936
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2093434
关于积分的说明 5267975
捐赠科研通 1820104
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 907942
版权声明 559236
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 484991