艺术理论
现代艺术
哲学
天才
后现代主义
当代艺术
形式主义(音乐)
认识论
艺术
艺术史
美学
文学类
表演艺术
音乐剧
出处
期刊:Kantian Review
[Cambridge University Press]
日期:2021-12-01
卷期号:26 (4): 619-634
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1017/s1369415421000492
摘要
Abstract Can Kant’s theory of fine art serve as a theory of modern art? It all depends on what ‘modern’ means. The word can mean current or contemporary, indexed to the time of use, and in that sense the answer is yes: Kant’s theory of genius implies that successful art is always to some extent novel, so there should always be something that counts as contemporary art on his theory. But ‘modern’ can also be used adjectively, perhaps more properly as ‘modernist’, to refer to art of a particular moment, in some cases superseded by postmodern art. Kant’s theory is not a theory of modernist art in at least one prominent form, the formalism of Clement Greenberg. But other theories, such as those of George Dickie and Arthur Danto, although triggered by particular works of modernist art and meant to accommodate them, were meant to be theories of what art was always doing, and Kant’s is too. In that sense it can be considered a modern theory of art but not a theory of modern art.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI