团队合作
背景(考古学)
可信赖性
可靠性(半导体)
自动化
鉴定(生物学)
任务(项目管理)
心理学
业务
风险分析(工程)
社会心理学
计算机科学
工程类
经济
生物
机械工程
量子力学
物理
古生物学
植物
功率(物理)
管理
系统工程
作者
Md Fahim,Mohammad Maifi Hasan Khan,Theodore Jensen,Yusuf Albayram
标识
DOI:10.1080/10447318.2022.2076772
摘要
In the context of teamwork, prior efforts noted that trust degradation due to failures is slower in the case of human partners compared to automated agents. In our work, we wanted to investigate whether this holds true when the cost of mistakes (i.e., risk) is high. Toward that, we designed a 2 (partner: automation/human) × 2 (risk: low/high) × 2 (reliability: low/high) between-group study where participants completed five rounds of a target identification task with a partner (either automation or human). The findings suggest that users’ perceived trustworthiness of the partner is affected by reliability groups appropriately, irrespective of risk groups. However, with human partners, although participants fail to calibrate dependence appropriately in low-risk groups, dependence is appropriate in high-risk groups. The finding suggests that the effect of human-like characteristics on trust should not be considered independent of risk. The implications of our findings are discussed in the paper.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI