温室气体
碳排放税
气候变化
经济
政治
政府(语言学)
价值(数学)
公共经济学
斯特恩
福利
全球变暖
自然资源经济学
政治经济学
政治学
市场经济
法学
工程类
语言学
机器学习
海洋工程
哲学
生态学
计算机科学
生物
出处
期刊:University of Minnesota, USA - AgEcon Search
日期:2008-01-01
被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.22004/ag.econ.6006
摘要
This paper conveniently skips any controversy associated with the science of climate change. On the assumption that greenhouse gas emissions are causing climate change that is detrimental to humanity, the paper focuses on some economic dimensions of the issue which seem to be poorly understood by Australian media commentators, policy analysts, interest groups and the political parties. Using a neoclassical welfare economics framework the paper explores the costs and benefits of greenhouse gas abatement with reference to the findings of the Stern Report, the setting of greenhouse gas targets by Australian political parties, the danger of the government “picking winners” and the emerging carbon theory of value. The paper concludes with a brief review of the relative merits of a carbon tax and a cap and trade approach. Key Words: This paper conveniently skips any controversy associated with the science of climate change. On the assumption that greenhouse gas emissions are causing climate change that is detrimental to humanity, the paper focuses on some economic dimensions of the issue which seem to be poorly understood by Australian media commentators, policy analysts, interest groups and the political parties. Using a neoclassical welfare economics framework the paper explores the costs and benefits of greenhouse gas abatement with reference to the findings of the Stern Report, the setting of greenhouse gas targets by Australian political parties, the danger of the government “picking winners” and the emerging carbon theory of value. The paper concludes with a brief review of the relative merits of a carbon tax and a cap and trade approach.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI