药物开发
监管科学
医学
政府(语言学)
风险分析(工程)
药品
药理学
语言学
哲学
病理
作者
Amy M. Avila,Ilona Bebenek,Donna L. Mendrick,Jackye Peretz,Jia Yao,Paul C. Brown
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105345
摘要
Previously, we provided an FDA/CDER perspective on nonclinical testing strategies and briefly discussed the opportunities and challenges of using new approach methodologies (NAMs) in drug development, especially for regulatory purposes. To facilitate the integration of NAMs into nonclinical regulatory testing, we surveyed the CDER Pharmacology/Toxicology community to identify the nonclinical challenges faced by CDER review staff, including gaps and areas of concern underserved by current nonclinical testing approaches, and to understand how development of NAMs with specific contexts of use (COUs) could potentially alleviate them. Survey outcomes were coalesced into CDER-identified needs for which NAMs with specific COUs could potentially be developed to address gaps and challenges in nonclinical safety assessments. We also discussed the current FDA procedure for validation and qualification of NAMs intended to inform regulatory decisions. This manuscript is intended to facilitate productive discussions and collaborations with regulatory, government, and academic stakeholders within the drug development community regarding the development and regulatory use of NAMs and their role in safety and efficacy assessment of pharmaceuticals.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI