Vascular Access Type and Survival Outcomes in Hemodialysis Patients: A Seven-Year Cohort Study

医学 比例危险模型 血液透析 危险系数 队列 透析 内科学 混淆 生存分析 外科 存活率 队列研究 置信区间
作者
Jesús Venegas-Ramírez,Gustavo A. Hernández‐Fuentes,C. Palomares,Janet Diaz‐Martinez,Joel I. Navarro-Cuellar,Patricia Calvo-Soto,Carlos A. Duran,Rosa Tapia-Vargas,Ana C. Espíritu-Mojarro,Alejandro Figueroa-Gutiérrez,José Guzmán-Esquivel,Daniel Antonio-Flores,Carmen Meza‐Robles,Iván Delgado‐Enciso
出处
期刊:Medicina-lithuania [Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute]
卷期号:61 (4): 584-584
标识
DOI:10.3390/medicina61040584
摘要

Background and Objectives: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis due to their impact on patient outcomes, including survival, infection rates, and overall quality of life. Despite strong recommendations favoring AVF, gaps in AVF utilization remain, influenced by clinical, demographic, and systemic factors. This study is the first to analyze survival outcomes associated with different dialysis vascular access types, adjusting for key clinical, demographic variables, and other comorbidities over extended periods. Materials and Methods: This ambispective cohort study followed 428 hemodialysis patients over seven years. Patients were categorized based on their access type: AVF (n = 189), tunneled central venous catheter (CVC) (n = 178), and non-tunneled CVC (n = 61). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to estimate survival curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for potential confounders, including age, diabetes, and hypertension. Results: The 2-year survival rates were as follows: AVF 94.1%, tunneled CVC 70.0%, and non-tunneled CVC 36.6%. The 7-year survival rates were as follows: AVF 65.5%, tunneled CVC 26.4%, and non-tunneled CVC 11.0%. Compared to AVF, tunneled CVC use was associated with a 2.8-fold increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [AdHR] 2.8, 95% CI 2.0–4.1), while non-tunneled CVC increased the risk 5-fold (AdHR 5.0, 95% CI 3.3–7.6). Notably, older adults, women, and diabetic patients were disproportionately represented in the groups with tunneled and non-tunneled catheters. Conclusions: Adjusted survival analyses highlight the significantly lower survival rates associated with CVC use compared to AVF. Non-tunneled catheters are generally not used for prolonged periods, and this cohort provides evidence of their prognosis for long-term use. These findings reinforce the need to prioritize AVF placement whenever feasible, reinforcing health education on this topic, to improve long-term outcomes for hemodialysis patients.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
6000完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
JJ完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
哈哈哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
6000发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
平淡的友儿应助tracer526采纳,获得10
4秒前
隐形曼青应助XFF采纳,获得10
4秒前
CipherSage应助QKD采纳,获得10
4秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
8秒前
青柠完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
12秒前
精神稳定发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
精神稳定发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
精神稳定发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
科研通AI6.4应助鳗鱼思真采纳,获得10
13秒前
猫头小贼完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
17秒前
keyanbaicai发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
路奇发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
丘比特应助高高千筹采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
Ssieng发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
摆哥发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
立菠萝发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
25秒前
26秒前
26秒前
akun完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
sc212gzh发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
30秒前
NCS杀手发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
32秒前
明亮的藏花完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
32秒前
suli发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
丰富老鼠完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
平凡完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
An Introduction to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching 750
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 500
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in Digital Age? Technology, AI Bots, and Psychotherapy after Covid 444
煤炭地下气化渗流燃烧方法的研究 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7632541
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9206935
关于积分的说明 19746181
捐赠科研通 7201897
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3274871
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2436759
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2271568