Costal Chondrocyte–Derived Pellet-Type Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A 5-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND: Costal chondrocyte-derived pellet-type autologous chondrocyte implantation (CCP-ACI) has been introduced as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of articular cartilage defects. We had previously conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing CCP-ACI versus microfracture at 1 year postoperatively. PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of CCP-ACI versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee at 5 years postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: This study describes the mean 5-year follow-up of a previously published prospective clinical trial. The previous prospective trial compared the results of CCP-ACI versus microfracture until 1 year of follow-up. Of the 30 patients who were included in the previous study, 25 were followed up for 5 years. Patients were evaluated based on clinical outcome scores (Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and visual analog scale for pain), magnetic resonance imaging findings, and rates of treatment failure at last follow-up. RESULTS: = .017, respectively). There was 1 case of treatment failure that occurred in the microfracture group. CONCLUSION: The present randomized controlled trial indicated that the results of both procedures clinically and statistically significantly improved at 1 and 5 years' follow-up in treating cartilage defects, but the results of CCP-ACI were superior to those of microfracture. Magnetic resonance imaging conducted at 1 year and 5 years after CCP-ACI revealed statistically significant superior structural integration with native cartilage tissue compared with microfracture. REGISTRATION: NCT03545269 (ClinicalTrials.gov).