亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Risk Factors for Incident Myopia in Australian Schoolchildren

医学 验光服务 眼科
作者
Amanda French,Ian G. Morgan,Paul Mitchell,Kathryn Rose
出处
期刊:Ophthalmology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:120 (10): 2100-2108 被引量:280
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.035
摘要

Purpose To examine the risk factors for incident myopia in Australian schoolchildren. Design Population-based, longitudinal cohort study. Participants The Sydney Adolescent Vascular and Eye Study (SAVES) was a 5- to 6-year follow-up of the Sydney Myopia Study (SMS). At follow-up, 2103 children were reexamined: 892 (50.5%) from the younger cohort and 1211 (51.5%) from the older cohort. Of these, 863 in the younger cohort and 1196 in the older cohort had complete refraction data. Methods Cycloplegic autorefraction (cyclopentolate 1%; Canon RK-F1; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) was measured at baseline and follow-up. Myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent refraction of ≤−0.50 diopters (D). Children were classified as having incident myopia if they were nonmyopic at baseline and myopic in either eye at follow-up. A comprehensive questionnaire determined the amount of time children spent outdoors and doing near work per week at baseline, as well as ethnicity, parental myopia, and socioeconomic status. Main Outcome Measures Incident myopia. Results Children who became myopic spent less time outdoors compared with children who remained nonmyopic (younger cohort, 16.3 vs. 21.0 hours, respectively, P < 0.0001; older cohort, 17.2 vs. 19.6 hours, respectively, P=0.001). Children who became myopic performed significantly more near work (19.4 vs. 17.6 hours; P=0.02) in the younger cohort, but not in the older cohort (P=0.06). Children with 1 or 2 parents who were myopic had greater odds of incident myopia (1 parent: odds ratio [OR], 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9–5.2; both parents: OR, 3.3, 95% CI, 1.6–6.8) in the younger but not the older cohort. Children of East Asian ethnicity had a higher incidence of myopia compared with children of European Caucasian ethnicity (both P < 0.0001) and spent less time outdoors (both P < 0.0001). A less hyperopic refraction at baseline was the most significant predictor of incident myopia. The addition of time outdoors, near work, parental myopia, and ethnicity to the model significantly improved the predictive power (P < 0.0001) in the younger cohort but had little effect in the older cohort. Conclusions Time spent outdoors was negatively associated with incident myopia in both age cohorts. Near work and parental myopia were additional significant risk factors for myopia only in the younger cohort. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. To examine the risk factors for incident myopia in Australian schoolchildren. Population-based, longitudinal cohort study. The Sydney Adolescent Vascular and Eye Study (SAVES) was a 5- to 6-year follow-up of the Sydney Myopia Study (SMS). At follow-up, 2103 children were reexamined: 892 (50.5%) from the younger cohort and 1211 (51.5%) from the older cohort. Of these, 863 in the younger cohort and 1196 in the older cohort had complete refraction data. Cycloplegic autorefraction (cyclopentolate 1%; Canon RK-F1; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) was measured at baseline and follow-up. Myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent refraction of ≤−0.50 diopters (D). Children were classified as having incident myopia if they were nonmyopic at baseline and myopic in either eye at follow-up. A comprehensive questionnaire determined the amount of time children spent outdoors and doing near work per week at baseline, as well as ethnicity, parental myopia, and socioeconomic status. Incident myopia. Children who became myopic spent less time outdoors compared with children who remained nonmyopic (younger cohort, 16.3 vs. 21.0 hours, respectively, P < 0.0001; older cohort, 17.2 vs. 19.6 hours, respectively, P=0.001). Children who became myopic performed significantly more near work (19.4 vs. 17.6 hours; P=0.02) in the younger cohort, but not in the older cohort (P=0.06). Children with 1 or 2 parents who were myopic had greater odds of incident myopia (1 parent: odds ratio [OR], 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9–5.2; both parents: OR, 3.3, 95% CI, 1.6–6.8) in the younger but not the older cohort. Children of East Asian ethnicity had a higher incidence of myopia compared with children of European Caucasian ethnicity (both P < 0.0001) and spent less time outdoors (both P < 0.0001). A less hyperopic refraction at baseline was the most significant predictor of incident myopia. The addition of time outdoors, near work, parental myopia, and ethnicity to the model significantly improved the predictive power (P < 0.0001) in the younger cohort but had little effect in the older cohort. Time spent outdoors was negatively associated with incident myopia in both age cohorts. Near work and parental myopia were additional significant risk factors for myopia only in the younger cohort.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
6秒前
19秒前
30秒前
半载诗发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
34秒前
46秒前
58秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
半载诗完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
automan完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
笨笨山芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
Yuki完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助30
2分钟前
2分钟前
科研通AI2S应助一路硕博采纳,获得10
2分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助30
4分钟前
4分钟前
一路硕博发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
Virtual应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
4分钟前
朴素的士晋完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
5分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
6分钟前
cgliuhx完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
高分求助中
Organic Chemistry 20086
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Voyage au bout de la révolution: de Pékin à Sochaux 700
yolo算法-游泳溺水检测数据集 500
First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies, 2nd Edition 500
Metals, Minerals, and Society 400
International socialism & Australian labour : the Left in Australia, 1919-1939 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4294795
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3820906
关于积分的说明 11962636
捐赠科研通 3463517
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1899768
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 947944
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 850582