Correlations and Sex Differences in Seven Sensory Modalities of Imagery

作者
Alfredo Campos,Diego Campos‐Juanatey
出处
期刊:North American Journal of Psychology 卷期号:16 (3): 587- 被引量:4
摘要

Mental images are representations of people, objects, and situations that are not actually present at the time of visualizing an image (Campos, 1998; Paivio, 1979; Piaget, 1962; Richardson, 1980). Mental imagery may be classified according to the sensory organs involved, i.e., visual, auditory, cutaneous, kinaesthetic, gustatory, olfactory and organic imagery (Campos, 1998; Denis, 1984). Imagery questionnaires and performance tests are extensively used to measure image vividness. Tulving, McNulty, and Ozier (1965), and Paivio (1965) defined vividness of imagery as the ease with which you can picture something in your mind when presented the word. The most widely used questionnaire is the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ, Mark, 1973; McKelvie, 1995), and the questionnaire most extensively used to measure image vividness in all of the sensory modalities is the abridged version (Sheehan, 1967) of the Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery (Betts, 1909). Most mental imagery studies have focused on visual imagery, but a few have assessed the other senses. The same has occurred with imagery questionnaires, i.e., most measured visual imagery, but a few examined the mental imagery of the other senses (Campos & Perez-Fabello, 2005, 2011; Gissurarson, 1992; Richardson, 1994; Willander & Baraldi, 2010). The only questionnaire measuring the seven different types of imagery corresponding to the seven sensory modalities is the Betts' Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery (Betts' QMI; Sheehan, 1967). Though the Betts' QMI (Sheehan, 1967) has been extensively used, the seven scales that comprise it have rarely been evaluated, as they are normally used in their totality. The only study to have examined the correlations between the scales on the questionnaire in relation to sex found significant correlations among all of the scales (Ernest, 1983). The correlations between the scales on the Betts' QMI ranged from .44 (p The differences between women and men regarding the vividness of mental imagery remains a controversial issue in cognitive psychology and, in spite of the numerous studies, there is no satisfactory consensus (see Richardson, 1994, for a review). For example, the numerous studies that have used the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ, Marks, 1973) have reported contradictory results. Richardson (1995) reviewed the literature and reported that women obtained slightly higher scores than men on the VVIQ, but McKelvie's (1995) review of the literature found no significant sex difference on this questionnaire. Two of the obstacles hindering any precise determination of differences in mental imagery between women and men are the numerous types of mental imagery, and the many ways of measuring them (Blazhenkova & Kozhevnikov, 2009; Campos, 2009, 2012, 2014; Horowitz, 1983). On the whole, most measures of imagery are based either on imagery questionnaires or performance tests (see Campos, 2014, for a review). Surprisingly, correlations between imagery questionnaires and performance tests were poor or not significant (Burton & Fogarty, 2003; Campos, 2009, 2012, 2014; Ernest, 1977). Notwithstanding, the correlations between the performance tests themselves were high, and the correlations for the imagery questionnaires were also high both in women and in men, and in the group total for both genders (Burton & Fogarty, 2003; Campos, 2014; Ernest, 1983). Few studies have examined sex in relation to scoring on each of the scales of the Betts' QMI (Ernest, 1983; Sacco & Reda, 1998; Sheehan, 1967). …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
星辰大海应助孙伟健采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
Djtc发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Buduan发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
顾矜应助hj0806采纳,获得30
1秒前
LDX应助夏不炎采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
小粥完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
鹤唳发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
一只呆果蝇完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Literature发布了新的文献求助200
5秒前
zhan发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
月是遗憾完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
整齐听枫发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
TT发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
SciGPT应助星语采纳,获得10
7秒前
藤藤菜发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
鹿夏之完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
完美世界应助孙伟健采纳,获得10
9秒前
在水一方应助mei人鱼采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
龙1完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
田帅完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
sleep完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
冷艳傲松发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
whl发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Akim应助milai采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
TT完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
曹鹏喜发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
传奇3应助孙伟健采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
Dream完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Horizon应助zjl采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
万能图书馆应助年轻寒梅采纳,获得10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 1000
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
Green Fire Retardants for Polymeric Materials 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7617585
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9192902
关于积分的说明 19701946
捐赠科研通 7190151
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3272024
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2434811
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2267143