任务(项目管理)
计算机科学
排名(信息检索)
认知负荷
认知
实证研究
知识管理
公制(单位)
认知心理学
人工智能
心理学
业务
营销
管理
认识论
哲学
经济
神经科学
标识
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2304.08861
摘要
While the emerging research field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) claims to address the lack of explainability in high-performance machine learning models, in practice, XAI targets developers rather than actual end-users. Unsurprisingly, end-users are often unwilling to use XAI-based decision support systems. Similarly, there is limited interdisciplinary research on end-users' behavior during XAI explanations usage, rendering it unknown how explanations may impact cognitive load and further affect end-user performance. Therefore, we conducted an empirical study with 271 prospective physicians, measuring their cognitive load, task performance, and task time for distinct implementation-independent XAI explanation types using a COVID-19 use case. We found that these explanation types strongly influence end-users' cognitive load, task performance, and task time. Further, we contextualized a mental efficiency metric, ranking local XAI explanation types best, to provide recommendations for future applications and implications for sociotechnical XAI research.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI