Antidepressant Augmentation versus Switch in Treatment-Resistant Geriatric Depression

安非他酮 阿立哌唑 医学 萧条(经济学) 抗抑郁药 人口 内科学 精神科 心理学 精神分裂症(面向对象编程) 戒烟 环境卫生 病理 海马体 经济 宏观经济学
作者
Eric J. Lenze,Benoit H. Mulsant,Steven P. Roose,Helen Lavretsky,Charles F. Reynolds,Daniel M. Blumberger,Patrick J. Brown,Pilar Cristancho,Alastair J. Flint,Marie Anne Gebara,Torie R Gettinger,Emily M. Lenard,J. Philip Miller,Ginger E. Nicol,Hanadi Ajam Oughli,Vy Pham,Bruce L. Rollman,Lei Yang,Jordan F. Karp
出处
期刊:The New England Journal of Medicine [Massachusetts Medical Society]
卷期号:388 (12): 1067-1079 被引量:87
标识
DOI:10.1056/nejmoa2204462
摘要

BACKGROUND: The benefits and risks of augmenting or switching antidepressants in older adults with treatment-resistant depression have not been extensively studied. METHODS: We conducted a two-step, open-label trial involving adults 60 years of age or older with treatment-resistant depression. In step 1, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to augmentation of existing antidepressant medication with aripiprazole, augmentation with bupropion, or a switch from existing antidepressant medication to bupropion. Patients who did not benefit from or were ineligible for step 1 were randomly assigned in step 2 in a 1:1 ratio to augmentation with lithium or a switch to nortriptyline. Each step lasted approximately 10 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in psychological well-being, assessed with the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Positive Affect and General Life Satisfaction subscales (population mean, 50; higher scores indicate greater well-being). A secondary outcome was remission of depression. RESULTS: In step 1, a total of 619 patients were enrolled; 211 were assigned to aripiprazole augmentation, 206 to bupropion augmentation, and 202 to a switch to bupropion. Well-being scores improved by 4.83 points, 4.33 points, and 2.04 points, respectively. The difference between the aripiprazole-augmentation group and the switch-to-bupropion group was 2.79 points (95% CI, 0.56 to 5.02; P = 0.014, with a prespecified threshold P value of 0.017); the between-group differences were not significant for aripiprazole augmentation versus bupropion augmentation or for bupropion augmentation versus a switch to bupropion. Remission occurred in 28.9% of patients in the aripiprazole-augmentation group, 28.2% in the bupropion-augmentation group, and 19.3% in the switch-to-bupropion group. The rate of falls was highest with bupropion augmentation. In step 2, a total of 248 patients were enrolled; 127 were assigned to lithium augmentation and 121 to a switch to nortriptyline. Well-being scores improved by 3.17 points and 2.18 points, respectively (difference, 0.99; 95% CI, -1.92 to 3.91). Remission occurred in 18.9% of patients in the lithium-augmentation group and 21.5% in the switch-to-nortriptyline group; rates of falling were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults with treatment-resistant depression, augmentation of existing antidepressants with aripiprazole improved well-being significantly more over 10 weeks than a switch to bupropion and was associated with a numerically higher incidence of remission. Among patients in whom augmentation or a switch to bupropion failed, changes in well-being and the occurrence of remission with lithium augmentation or a switch to nortriptyline were similar. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; OPTIMUM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02960763.).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
充电宝的应助被liliiii采纳,获得10
刚刚
huhu发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
SciGPT的应助被张张采纳,获得10
刚刚
JamesPei的应助被活吞鲨鱼采纳,获得10
刚刚
兮颜发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
机灵道罡发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
CDL完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
QC发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
yangjian完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
轩辕访波发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
仁爱的酒窝完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
CDL发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
zhangyupei发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
万能图书馆的应助被兮颜采纳,获得10
7秒前
shuu完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
7秒前
机灵道罡完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
liuyang完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
orange完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
果果123发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
Loupengying发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
小二郎的应助被阿达西采纳,获得30
10秒前
szj完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
积极的红酒完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
星辰大海的应助被果果123采纳,获得10
14秒前
MY完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
兮颜完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
17秒前
脆汁鸡发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
阿达西完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
赘婿的应助被chichi717采纳,获得10
20秒前
AIO完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
CodeCraft的应助被洛尘采纳,获得10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Spec 401: Standards for Jet Fuel Facility and Equipment Commissioning and Flushing at Airports, 2026.1 (Original Issue) 1000
Spec 103: Standard for Jet Fuel Quality Control at Airports, Revision 2026.1 1000
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
二维钙钛矿人工光电突触的可塑性及应用的研究 500
Topological Photonics: Fundamentals and Applications 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8095443
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9506881
关于积分的说明 21457035
捐赠科研通 7669359
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3406334
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2534382
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2445753