Reliability and Validity of the Therapy Intensity Level Scale: Analysis of Clinimetric Properties of a Novel Approach to Assess Management of Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury

格拉斯哥昏迷指数 创伤性脑损伤 医学 组内相关 重症监护 颅内压 等级间信度 损伤严重程度评分 格拉斯哥结局量表 物理疗法 毒物控制 急诊医学 麻醉 伤害预防 心理学 心理测量学 重症监护医学 评定量表 精神科 临床心理学 发展心理学
作者
Patrick Zuercher,J Groen,Marcel Aries,Ewout W. Steyerberg,Andrew I.R. Maas,Ari Ercole,David Menon
出处
期刊:Journal of Neurotrauma [Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.]
卷期号:33 (19): 1768-1774 被引量:77
标识
DOI:10.1089/neu.2015.4266
摘要

We aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Therapy Intensity Level scale (TIL) for intracranial pressure (ICP) management. We reviewed the medical records of 31 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in two European intensive care units (ICUs). The ICP TIL was derived over a 4-day period for 4-h (TIL4) and 24-h epochs (TIL24). TIL scores were compared with historical schemes for TIL measurement, with each other, and with clinical variables. TIL24 scores in ICU patients with TBI were compared with two control groups: patients with extracranial trauma necessitating intensive care (Trauma_ICU; n = 20) and patients with TBI not needing ICU care (TBI_WARD; n = 19), to further determine the discriminative validity of the TIL for ICP-related ICU interventions. Interrater and intraobserver agreement were excellent for TIL4 and TIL24 (Cohen κ: 0.98-0.99; intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.99-1; p < 0.0005). The mean + standard deviation (SD) TIL24 in the ICU TBI cohort was significantly higher than the Trauma_ICU patients and the TBI_WARD patients (8.2 ± 3.2 vs. 2.2 ± 0.9 and 0.1 ± 0.1, respectively; p < 0.005 for both comparisons). Correlations between the TIL scale scores and historical TIL scores, between TIL24 and the Glasgow Coma Scale, and between a range of TIL metrics and summary measures of ICP over the 4-day period, were all highly significant (p < 0.01). The results were consistent with the expected direction. A linear mixed effect analysis, accounting for within-subjects repeated measures, showed strong correlation between TIL4 and 4-h ICP (p < 0.0000005). The TIL scale is a reliable measurement instrument with a high degree of validity for assessing the therapeutic intensity level of ICP management in patients with TBI.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
nigger发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
NMR完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
很急完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
SciGPT应助aaa采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
wu发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
LIU完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
小马甲应助乙酰胆碱采纳,获得10
4秒前
展会恩发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
阿海的发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
11秒前
12秒前
聪明小钟完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
qizhixu发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
天天快乐应助斯文冷梅采纳,获得10
15秒前
万能图书馆应助尊嘟假嘟采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
aaa发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
科研通AI6.2应助尊嘟假嘟采纳,获得10
20秒前
深情安青应助尊嘟假嘟采纳,获得10
20秒前
情怀应助尊嘟假嘟采纳,获得10
20秒前
Qw发布了新的文献求助150
20秒前
Owen应助尊嘟假嘟采纳,获得10
20秒前
彭于晏应助尊嘟假嘟采纳,获得10
20秒前
血狼旭魔完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
caffeine应助尊嘟假嘟采纳,获得10
20秒前
汉堡包应助尊嘟假嘟采纳,获得10
20秒前
Akim应助尊嘟假嘟采纳,获得10
20秒前
英俊的铭应助尊嘟假嘟采纳,获得10
20秒前
YitingW完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
李健应助坚强的凡双采纳,获得10
22秒前
Cheffe发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
小白完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Radical Reactions 500
Stratospheric Ozone: A Textbook 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7353868
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8964879
关于积分的说明 19046738
捐赠科研通 7002243
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3221808
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2386204
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2202542