Comparative effectiveness of mepolizumab and omalizumab in severe asthma: An indirect treatment comparison

美波利祖马布 医学 奥马佐单抗 恶化 耐受性 哮喘 人口 内科学 随机对照试验 儿科 不利影响 免疫学 免疫球蛋白E 嗜酸性粒细胞 抗体 环境卫生
作者
Sarah Cockle,G. Stynes,Necdet Gunsoy,Daniel J. Parks,Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho,Jaro Wex,Eric Bradford,Frank Albers,Jenny Willson
出处
期刊:Respiratory Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:123: 140-148 被引量:44
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2016.12.009
摘要

BackgroundSevere asthma is a heterogeneous disease. Patients with both eosinophilic and allergic asthma phenotypes may be eligible for treatment with mepolizumab and omalizumab. Evidence on the relative effectiveness of these treatments in this ‘overlap’ population would be informative for clinical and payer decision making.MethodsA systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison (Bayesian framework) were performed to assess the comparative effectiveness and tolerability of mepolizumab and omalizumab, as add-ons to standard of care. Studies included in the primary analysis were double-blind, randomized controlled trials, ≥12 weeks' duration enrolling patients with severe asthma with a documented exacerbation history and receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus ≥1 additional controller. Two populations were examined: patients potentially eligible for 1) both treatments (Overlap population) and 2) either treatment (Trial population).ResultsIn the Overlap population, no differences between treatments in clinically significant exacerbations and exacerbations requiring hospitalization were found, although trends favored mepolizumab (rate ratio [RR]:0.66 [95% credible intervals (Crl):0.37,1.19]; 0.19[0.02,2.32], respectively). In the Trial population, mepolizumab treatment produced greater reductions in clinically significant exacerbations (RR:0.63 [95% CrI:0.45,0.89]) but not exacerbations requiring hospitalization compared with omalizumab (RR:0.58 [95% Crl: 0.16,2.13]), although the trend favored mepolizumab. Both treatments had broadly comparable effects on lung function, and similar tolerability profiles.ConclusionsWhilst this analysis has limitations due to a restricted evidence base and residual heterogeneity, it showed that in patients with severe asthma, mepolizumab seems to be at least as effective as omalizumab and that the tolerability profiles of the two treatments did not meaningfully differentiate.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
11发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
科研通AI6.4应助轻舟轻舟采纳,获得10
2秒前
张琪完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
张北海完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
HH发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
ZJH发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小斌发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
完美世界应助九思采纳,获得10
3秒前
sanner发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
cheng233应助小陈采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
淡定语完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
无极微光应助yang采纳,获得20
7秒前
molihuakai应助huntme采纳,获得10
8秒前
苏铭关注了科研通微信公众号
8秒前
朴素的夏云完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI2S应助Amber采纳,获得30
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
渺渺完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
zyw发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
彭于晏应助青青HAN采纳,获得10
11秒前
科研通AI6.4应助炙热从蕾采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
SciGPT应助小斌采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
pyh发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
不爱吃番茄完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
五六七发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
隐形曼青应助omega采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Arthritis and Related Conditions, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7288116
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8907880
关于积分的说明 18852675
捐赠科研通 6956803
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3208782
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2378652
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2184608