心理学
奇纳
眼球运动
斯科普斯
理解力
梅德林
认知心理学
失语症
阅读理解
眼动
心理信息
阅读(过程)
计算机科学
人工智能
语言学
神经科学
精神科
心理干预
哲学
政治学
法学
程序设计语言
作者
Saryu Sharma,Hana Kim,Havan Harris,Amanda Haberstroh,Heather Harris Wright,Kathrin Rothermich
出处
期刊:Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
[American Speech-Language-Hearing Association]
日期:2021-03-17
卷期号:64 (3): 1008-1022
被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1044/2020_jslhr-20-00287
摘要
Aim The aim of this scoping review is to identify the eye tracking paradigms and eye movement measures used to investigate auditory and reading comprehension deficits in persons with aphasia (PWA). Method MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, OTseeker, Scopus, Google Scholar, Grey Literature Database, and ProQuest Search (Dissertations & Theses) were searched for relevant studies. The Covidence software was used to manage the initial and full-text screening process for the search. Results and Discussion From a total of 1,803 studies, 68 studies were included for full-text screening. In addition, 418 records from gray literature were also screened. After full-text screening, 16 studies were included for this review—12 studies for auditory comprehension in PWA and four studies for reading comprehension in PWA. The review highlights the use of common eye tracking paradigms used to study language comprehension in PWA. We also discusse eye movement measures and how they help in assessing auditory and reading comprehension. Methodological challenges of using eye tracking are discussed. Conclusion The studies summarized in this scoping review provide evidence that the eye tracking methods are beneficial for studying auditory and reading comprehension in PWA.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI