Microbiome Analysis of More Than 2,000 NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Samples Shows the Potential to Improve Screening Accuracy

医学 结直肠癌 癌症 癌症筛查 粪便潜血 结直肠癌筛查 微生物群 内科学 肿瘤科 结肠镜检查
作者
Caroline Young,Henry M. Wood,Alba Fuentes Balaguer,Daniel Bottomley,Niall Gallop,Lyndsay Wilkinson,Sally C Benton,Martin Brealey,Cerin John,Carole Burtonwood,Kelsey N. Thompson,Yan Yan,Jennifer H. Barrett,Eva Morris,Curtis Huttenhower,Philip Quirke
出处
期刊:Clinical Cancer Research [American Association for Cancer Research]
卷期号:27 (8): 2246-2254 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3807
摘要

Abstract Purpose: There is potential for fecal microbiome profiling to improve colorectal cancer screening. This has been demonstrated by research studies, but it has not been quantified at scale using samples collected and processed routinely by a national screening program. Experimental Design: Between 2016 and 2019, the largest of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme hubs prospectively collected processed guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) samples with subsequent colonoscopy outcomes: blood-negative [n = 491 (22%)]; colorectal cancer [n = 430 (19%)]; adenoma [n = 665 (30%)]; colonoscopy-normal [n = 300 (13%)]; nonneoplastic [n = 366 (16%)]. Samples were transported and stored at room temperature. DNA underwent 16S rRNA gene V4 amplicon sequencing. Taxonomic profiling was performed to provide features for classification via random forests (RF). Results: Samples provided 16S amplicon-based microbial profiles, which confirmed previously described colorectal cancer–microbiome associations. Microbiome-based RF models showed potential as a first-tier screen, distinguishing colorectal cancer or neoplasm (colorectal cancer or adenoma) from blood-negative with AUC 0.86 (0.82–0.89) and AUC 0.78 (0.74–0.82), respectively. Microbiome-based models also showed potential as a second-tier screen, distinguishing from among gFOBT blood-positive samples, colorectal cancer or neoplasm from colonoscopy-normal with AUC 0.79 (0.74–0.83) and AUC 0.73 (0.68–0.77), respectively. Models remained robust when restricted to 15 taxa, and performed similarly during external validation with metagenomic datasets. Conclusions: Microbiome features can be assessed using gFOBT samples collected and processed routinely by a national colorectal cancer screening program to improve accuracy as a first- or second-tier screen. The models required as few as 15 taxa, raising the potential of an inexpensive qPCR test. This could reduce the number of colonoscopies in countries that use fecal occult blood test screening.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
6秒前
Maestro_S应助枫叶采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
可可发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
疯度发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
14秒前
kunyi发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
16秒前
小小aa16完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
wxt完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
疯度完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
qnmlgbd55发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Xi ~发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
南风发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
qiu发布了新的文献求助20
24秒前
24秒前
XP416完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
25秒前
Xi ~完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
29秒前
30秒前
科目三应助qiu采纳,获得10
31秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
32秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
32秒前
32秒前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
32秒前
32秒前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
32秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
32秒前
cctv18应助啊我是那个谁采纳,获得30
35秒前
哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
Vito发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
Lucas应助fly采纳,获得10
39秒前
Una发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
义气的银耳汤完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
Jrssion完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
高分求助中
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Plesiosaur extinction cycles; events that mark the beginning, middle and end of the Cretaceous 800
Recherches Ethnographiques sue les Yao dans la Chine du Sud 500
Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between blood lipids and venous thromboembolism 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 440
Wisdom, Gods and Literature Studies in Assyriology in Honour of W. G. Lambert 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2389769
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2095772
关于积分的说明 5278818
捐赠科研通 1822898
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 909318
版权声明 559593
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 485920