提交
审查
背景(考古学)
审计
业务
会计
公司治理
政府(语言学)
集合(抽象数据类型)
精算学
首都(建筑)
资产(计算机安全)
公共关系
主题(文档)
人力资本
经济
资本市场
保密
作者
McKenna Bailey,Stephen Glaeser,James D. Omartian,Aneesh Raghunandan
出处
期刊:Management Science
[Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences]
日期:2025-11-11
标识
DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2024.05125
摘要
We examine environmental, social, and governance (ESG) misreporting in the context of the UK government requirement to report gender employment ratios and pay gaps. Highlighting misreporting, many employers report a set of disclosures that are together mathematically impossible. Further, a disproportionate number of employers report perfectly balanced gender statistics, consistent with misreporting as a form of ESG-washing. Suggesting that a lack of ethical considerations encourages misreporting, employers involved in ESG controversies and who commit labor violations are more likely to misreport. Suggesting that capital market and media scrutiny discourage misreporting, employers that are the subject of an article about their gender pay gap reports and employers that receive an ESG audit or financial audit from a Big 4 auditor are less likely to misreport. Overall, our results suggest that 12%–15% of employers misreport in 2017 and 8%–11% misreport in subsequent years. Our findings highlight the importance of meaningful oversight within the context of ESG reporting. This paper was accepted by Ranjani Krishnan, accounting. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05125 .
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI