医学
精密医学
内科学
个性化医疗
肿瘤科
肺癌
癌症医学
临床肿瘤学
临床试验
癌症
精确肿瘤学
生物信息学
病理
生物
作者
Patricia Martin-Romano,Laura Mezquita,Antoine Hollebecque,Ludovic Lacroix,Etienne Rouleau,Anas Gazzah,Rastilav Bahleda,David Planchard,Andrea Varga,Capucine Baldini,Sophie Postel-Vinay,Luc Friboulet,Yohann Loriot,Loic Verlingue,Arthur Geraud,Maud Ngo Camus,Claudio Nicotra,Jean Charles Soria,Fabrice André,Benjamin Besse,Christophe Massard,Antoine Italiano
摘要
PURPOSE To facilitate implementation of precision medicine in clinical management of cancer, the European Society of Medical Oncology proposed in 2018 a new scale to harmonize and standardize the reporting and interpretation of clinically relevant genomics data (ESMO Scale of Actionability of molecular Targets [ESCAT]). This study aims to characterize the clinical impact of matching targetable genomic alterations (GAs) in patients with advanced cancer according to ESCAT. MATERIAL AND METHODS Analysis of next-generation sequencing results from 552 patients is included in two prospective precision medicine studies at Gustave Roussy. End points included objective response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival according to ESCAT. RESULTS Molecular data from 516 patients were available and discussed within a Molecular Tumor Board. The most common tumor types were GI (n = 164; 30%), lung (n = 137; 25%), and urologic tumors (n = 68; 13%). Overall, 379 GAs were considered as actionable targets according to ESCAT in 348 (67%) patients. In 31 (6%) patients, two concomitant actionable targets were identified. On the basis of ESCAT, GAs were considered to be classified as tier I in 120 patients (29%), II in 25 patients (5%), III in 80 patients (16%), and IV in 153 patients (30%). A total of 136 patients (27%) received a matched therapy. ESCAT was significantly associated with objective response rates and clinical benefit rates. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 8.9), 3 months (95% CI, 1 to not available), 3 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 3.8), and 4 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 6.3) for ESCAT I, II, III, and IV, respectively ( P = .0125). CONCLUSION Implementation of ESCAT classification for clinical decision making by Molecular Tumor Board is feasible and useful to better tailor therapies in patients with cancer.