Randomized Sham Controlled Trial of Targeted Lung Denervation in Patients with COPD (AIRFLOW-3)

医学 随机对照试验 去神经支配 慢性阻塞性肺病 内科学 物理疗法 重症监护医学
作者
Pallav L. Shah,Dirk‐Jan Slebos,Richard Sue,Surya P. Bhatt,Christian Ghattas,Charlie Strange,Bruno Degano,Arschang Valipour,Stephan Eisenmann,José de Vinatea de Cárdenas,Charles‐Hugo Marquette,Jose Soto-Soto,Frank C. Sciurba,Francesca Conway,James Tonkin,Anand Tana,Nathaniel Marchetti,Jorine E. Hartman,Valentin Héluain,Nicolas Guibert
出处
期刊:American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine [American Thoracic Society]
标识
DOI:10.1164/rccm.202502-0404oc
摘要

Rationale: AIRFLOW-3 was a 1:1 randomized, double blind, sham controlled trial of the d'Nerva Targeted Lung Denervation (TLD) System in patients with COPD. Objective: Evaluate the impact of TLD on COPD exacerbations compared to optimal medical treatment. Methods: AIRFLOW-3 patients were symptomatic (CAT ≥10) with moderate to very severe airflow obstruction (25% ≤ FEV1 ≤ 80% predicted) and GOLD E status (≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation over prior 12 months). The primary endpoint was comparison of time-to-first moderate or severe COPD exacerbation through 12 months between the Treatment (TLD + optimal medical treatment) and Sham Control groups (sham procedure + optimal medical treatment). Secondary endpoints included rate of severe COPD exacerbations, change in quality of life (SGRQ-C and SF-36), change in lung function (FVC, FEV1, RV), and change in CAT. Measurements and Main Results: 388 patients were randomized 1:1 at 32 sites. There was no difference between TLD compared to sham treatment in probability of participants having a moderate or severe COPD exacerbation, HR 1.268 (95% CI, 0.988 to 1.628). At 1 year, the TLD group had less dyspnea (> 1 point improvement in TDI 35.4 vs 24.1%, p 0.021) compared to sham. Post-hoc analyses revealed that failure to reach the primary endpoint was driven by an insufficient number of patients exhibiting an airway-predominant phenotype (lung hyperinflation without significant emphysema). Conclusions: AIRFLOW-3 failed to meet its primary endpoint. However, post-hoc analyses identified a responder profile; a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial is being designed to confirm these findings.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Rita应助啵啵采纳,获得10
1秒前
Rita应助啵啵采纳,获得10
1秒前
null应助啵啵采纳,获得10
1秒前
上官若男应助yyyyy采纳,获得10
3秒前
辛艺完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
ss完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
千里完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
6哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
天天快乐应助冷静的牛青采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
molihuakai应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
Nole应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
6秒前
7秒前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
胡侃应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
7秒前
7秒前
烟花应助陈宇静采纳,获得10
8秒前
煎饼发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
我是老大应助siny采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
山头虎发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
12秒前
陈晓晓发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
冯冯发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
momo发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Jieyinghu发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
香蕉觅云应助alone采纳,获得10
14秒前
冯聪聪完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
你笑的样子真好看完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
所所应助noneface采纳,获得10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Physiologic specialization in Peronospora manshurica 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7777297
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9318392
关于积分的说明 20363957
捐赠科研通 7364423
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3318922
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2466578
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2334129