清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Exploring generative AI assisted feedback writing for students’ written responses to a physics conceptual question with prompt engineering and few-shot learning

正确性 分级(工程) 数学教育 计算机科学 生成语法 生成模型 心理学 程序设计语言 人工智能 生物 生态学
作者
Tong Wan,Zhongzhou Chen
出处
期刊:Physical review [American Physical Society]
卷期号:20 (1) 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.010152
摘要

Instructor’s feedback plays a critical role in students’ development of conceptual understanding and reasoning skills. However, grading student written responses and providing personalized feedback can take a substantial amount of time, especially in large enrollment courses. In this study, we explore using GPT-3.5 to write feedback on students’ written responses to conceptual questions with prompt engineering and few-shot learning techniques. In stage I, we used a small portion (n=20) of the student responses on one conceptual question to iteratively train GPT to generate feedback. Four of the responses paired with human-written feedback were included in the prompt as examples for GPT. We tasked GPT to generate feedback for another 16 responses and refined the prompt through several iterations. In stage II, we gave four student researchers (one graduate and three undergraduate researchers) the 16 responses as well as two versions of feedback, one written by the authors and the other by GPT. Students were asked to rate the correctness and usefulness of each feedback and to indicate which one was generated by GPT. The results showed that students tended to rate the feedback by human and GPT equally on correctness, but they all rated the feedback by GPT as more useful. Additionally, the success rates of identifying GPT’s feedback were low, ranging from 0.1 to 0.6. In stage III, we tasked GPT to generate feedback for the rest of the students’ responses (n=65). The feedback messages were rated by four instructors based on the extent of modification needed if they were to give the feedback to students. All four instructors rated approximately 70% (ranging from 68% to 78%) of the feedback statements needing only minor or no modification. This study demonstrated the feasibility of using generative artificial intelligence (AI) as an assistant to generate feedback for student written responses with only a relatively small number of examples in the prompt. An AI assistant can be one of the solutions to substantially reduce time spent on grading student written responses. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
A29964095完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
fengwei完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
尊敬的小凡完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
25秒前
34秒前
35秒前
于向沉完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
安静的ky完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
Youcandoit完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Lillianzhu1完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
李煜琛完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
wxyalan发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
我是笨蛋完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
wxyalan完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
神通广大的MOMO完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
MMTI完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
Duke_ethan完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
LYZSh完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
随心所欲完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
lixiang完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
和风完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
默默无闻完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
西瓜发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
5分钟前
molihuakai应助西瓜采纳,获得10
5分钟前
神一样的鸟完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6分钟前
6分钟前
IMP完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
7分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1500
VALIDATION OF THE TAYLOR, ALAMEL AND VPSC MODELS FOR PLASTIC ANISOTROPY MODELING OF SHEET METALS 1000
Geist der Kunst und Kultur 1000
Middleton's Allergy Principles and Practice 10th Edition(Middleton's Allergy 2-Volume Set, 10th Edition) 1000
Resistance Spot Welding Dataset for Automobile Body-in-White Quality Analysis 748
日本現代怪異事典 副読本 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7401024
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9005801
关于积分的说明 19171965
捐赠科研通 7034910
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3231069
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2393311
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2212790