医学
抽吸
叙述性评论
背景(考古学)
梅德林
外科
重症监护医学
政治学
机械工程
生物
工程类
古生物学
法学
作者
Mariela Corrales,Matthias Boeykens,Alba Sierra,Eugenio Ventimiglia,Amelia Pietropaolo,Bhaskar Somani,Olivier Traxer
标识
DOI:10.1097/mou.0000000000001304
摘要
Purpose of review To provide a comprehensive overview of existing literature on suction-assisted ureteroscopy, evaluating its effectiveness and associated complications. Recent findings A literature review was conducted in December 2024 using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus databases by two independent authors. To structure and address the clinical question, “Do suction devices improve outcomes in RIRS?”, we employed the PICOS (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study Type) model. Exclusion criteria included case reports, studies involving suction techniques outside the context of endocorporeal laser lithotripsy (ELL), non-English language articles and articles or clinical trials with fewer than 15 patients. Summary Among the 36 included studies, 28 studies focused on SUAS, of which seven specifically investigated SUAS with pressure measurement, three studies examined DISS, three studies evaluated SURE and two comparative studies analyzed different suction techniques. The presented results show that advancements in suction technology seem very promising and likely to shift endourological practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI