Mapping of thoracic aorta growth rate on serial self-navigated 3D whole-heart magnetic resonance angiographies by image registration

Abstract Introduction Accurate and reproducible assessment of aortic diameters and their growth rate is of key importance for the management of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms [1,2]. It has been recently shown that image registration permits the assessment of progressive aortic dilation on ECG-gated contrast-enhanced CT angiography, outperforming manual quantification and allowing for 3D aortic size and growth mapping [3]. However, exposure to radiation makes it convenient to limit the use of CT for serial follow-up, especially in young patients. Self-navigated 3D whole-heart CMR acquisitions provides excellent image quality overcoming these limitations [4]. Purpose To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of registration-based assessment of aortic dilation using self-navigated 3D whole-heart CMR acquisitions. Methods Fifteen patients with two self-navigated 3D whole-heart CMR images obtained at least 1 year apart were included. Aortic root and thoracic aorta diameters were measured by 2 independent observers both manually (multiplanar reconstruction) and with the registration-based technique. To perform registration-based assessment, the aorta was semi-automatically segmented and typical anatomical landmarks were placed by each observer at baseline [3]. Geometrical mapping between baseline and follow-up acquisitions was obtained using deformable image registration, and applied to the baseline aortic surface points to obtain their location at follow-up. Finally, aortic diameters and their growth rate were automatically measured and used to calculated 3D aortic dilation maps. Agreement between techniques and their inter-observer reproducibility were calculated. Results Patients age was 27.2±14.5 years and 40% were male. Mean follow-up duration was 2.7±1.6 years. Compared to manual assessment, the registration-based technique presented low bias and excellent agreement for aortic diameters (Table 1), and low bias and moderate agreement for growth rates both in the aortic root and the thoracic aorta (Table, Fig. 1A). The techniques presented similar inter-observer reproducibility in the assessment of aortic diameters (Table 1), while the registration-based method demonstrated much higher inter-observer reproducibility in the assessment of growth rates in the aortic root and the thoracic aorta (Table 1, Fig. 1A and B). Three-dimensional mapping of thoracic aortic diameters and growth was highly reproducible (mean regional ICC=0.90 for diameters; 0.82 for growth rate). Conclusion The assessment of the dilation rate of the thoracic aorta via registration of serial self-navigated 3D whole-heart CMR acquisitions is accurate and reproducible in the aortic root and the thoracic aorta. Thus, it allows to assess local aortic growth without the drawbacks of CT. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Instituto de Salud Carlos III and Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaciόn (Spain)