已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Effects of Drop Sets on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

荟萃分析 肌肉肥大 医学 系统回顾 漏斗图 出版偏见 样本量测定 数学 统计 物理疗法 物理医学与康复 内科学 梅德林 化学 生物化学
作者
Lena Kristiansen Sødal,Eirik Kristiansen,Stian Larsen,Roland van den Tillaar
出处
期刊:Sports Medicine - Open [Springer Nature]
卷期号:9 (1) 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1186/s40798-023-00620-5
摘要

One of the most popular time-efficient training methods when training for muscle hypertrophy is drop sets, which is performed by taking sets to concentric muscle failure at a given load, then making a drop by reducing the load and immediately taking the next set to concentric or voluntary muscle failure. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effects of drop sets over traditional sets on skeletal muscle hypertrophy.This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The SPORTDiscus and MEDLINE/PubMed databases were searched on April 9, 2022, for all studies investigating the effects of the drop set training method on muscle hypertrophy that meets the predefined inclusion criteria. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3 (Biostat Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA) was used to run the statistical analysis. Publication bias was assessed through visual inspection of the funnel plots for asymmetry and statistically by Egger's regression test with an alpha level of 0.10.Six studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. The number of participants in the studies was 142 (28 women and 114 men) with an age range of 19.2-27 years. The average sample size was 23.6 ± 10.9 (range 9-41). Five studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. Meta-analysis showed that both the drop set and traditional training groups increased significantly from pre- to post-test regarding muscle hypertrophy (drop set standardized mean difference: 0.555, 95% CI 0.357-0.921, p < 0.0001; traditional set standardized mean difference: 0.437, 95% CI 0.266-0.608, p < 0.0001). No significant between-group difference was found (standardized mean difference: 0.155, 95% CI - 0.199 to - 0.509, p = 0.392).The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that drop sets present an efficient strategy for maximizing hypertrophy in those with limited time for training. There was no significant difference in hypertrophy measurements between the drop set and traditional training groups, but some of the drop set modalities took half to one-third of the time compared with traditional training.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1090完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
轨迹发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
tttt完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
juaner发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
云梦泽完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
轨迹完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Carol完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
BUKELE发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
15秒前
小马甲应助烟雨醉巷采纳,获得10
16秒前
Kaneki完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
Scorpia112应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
Scorpia112应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
TYK应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
笑笑完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
冰虚完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
beluga完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
37秒前
38秒前
41秒前
晴天发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
43秒前
星星完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
科研啦完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
49秒前
天天快乐应助晴天采纳,获得10
49秒前
casey完成签到 ,获得积分10
50秒前
宇宇完成签到 ,获得积分0
53秒前
二十七垚完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
烟雨醉巷发布了新的文献求助10
54秒前
合成肉完成签到,获得积分10
55秒前
观众完成签到,获得积分10
57秒前
彩色的依秋完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
LX有理想完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
潇洒访波完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
晴天完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
aaa5a123完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Competition Law: Cases and Materials, 5th edition 500
Introduction to Cosmetic Formulation and Technology, 2nd Edition 400
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 400
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
A Step-by-Step Guide to Qualitative Data Coding 2nd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6705233
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8446205
关于积分的说明 18039616
捐赠科研通 5944847
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2990682
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1966686
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1912121