医学
直肠脱垂
便秘
荟萃分析
外科
金标准(测试)
并发症
普通外科
直肠
放射科
内科学
作者
Georgios Koimtzis,Leandros Stefanopoulos,Georgios Geropoulos,Christopher Chalklin,Ioannis Karniadakis,Awad Ali M. Alawad,Vyron Alexandrou,Nikos Tteralli,Eliot Carrington-Windo,Andreas Papacharalampous,Kyriakos Psarras
摘要
(1) Background: Rectal prolapse is a benign condition that mainly affects females and the elderly. The most common symptoms are constipation and incontinence. The treatment of choice is surgical, but so far, there has been no gold standard method. The aim of this study is to compare the two most common intrabdominal procedures utilized for treating rectal prolapse: the resection rectopexy and the mesh rectopexy. (2) Methods: In this study, we conducted a thorough systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature and compared the two different approaches regarding their complication rate, recurrence rate, and improvement of symptoms rate. (3) Results: No statistically significant difference between the two methods was found regarding the operating time, the length of stay, the overall complication rate, the surgical site infection rate, the cardiopulmonary complication rate, the improvement in constipation and incontinence rates, and the recurrence rate. (4) Conclusions: Our study revealed that mesh rectopexy and resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse have similar short- and long-term outcomes. As a result, the decision for the procedure used should be individualized and based on the surgeon's preference and expertise.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI