Validity of data extraction in acupuncture meta-analysis: a reproducibility study protocol

医学 协议(科学) 再现性 数据提取 针灸科 荟萃分析 外部有效性 梅德林 医学物理学 替代医学 内科学 病理 色谱法 统计 化学 法学 数学 政治学
作者
Yuting Duan,Pinge Zhao,Yuening Deng,Wenting Luo,Zewei Chen,Shujuan Liu,Jinjin Zhou,Ziwen Xu,Binbin Tang,Lin Yu
出处
期刊:BMJ Open [BMJ]
卷期号:14 (11): e088736-e088736
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088736
摘要

Introduction Systematic review and meta-analysis occupy the apex of the evidence pyramid, serving as the most comprehensive and reliable form of evidence-based assessment. Data extraction is a crucial juncture in meta-analysis, establishing the underpinnings for the outcomes and deductions drawn from systematic reviews (SRs). However, the frequency of data extraction errors in meta-analysis is quite significant. Data extraction errors can lead to biased study results, affect the credibility of study results and even mislead clinical practice. The quantity of acupuncture randomised controlled trials and SRs has expanded rapidly recently, yet the validity of data extraction remains unexplored. Hence, our study aims to investigate the validity of data extraction errors in acupuncture SRs, the effect of data extraction errors on results and the relevant guidelines used erroneous results. Methods and analysis Four databases including MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane linbrary and EMBASE will be searched from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2023 for acupuncture SRs. Two researchers will independently extract data from the meta-analysis and the original study into a standardised data extraction table. A senior investigator, who did not participate in the data extraction process, will verify the results. In cases of discrepancies, the senior researcher will conduct further extraction and consult with another senior researcher to determine the final results. We will analyse the frequency and type of data extraction errors and data estimation errors and evaluate the effect of data extraction errors on results. Quantile regression will be used to explore the factors influencing data extraction error frequency at 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles. Finally, we will further search for guidelines used erroneous results. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not necessary for this study. This protocol has been registered in Open Science Framework Registries. Registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CHMPA .
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大模型应助我不是电容屏采纳,获得10
1秒前
17861120978完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
平常的惋庭完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Giang发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
redgb发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Ava应助爱吃米线采纳,获得10
2秒前
万能图书馆应助Tuan采纳,获得10
2秒前
SciGPT应助123采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
Orange应助章鱼哥采纳,获得10
3秒前
离蒲完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
搞怪凌文完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
英姑应助ACCEPT采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
善良雁桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
ddz发布了新的文献求助50
4秒前
Awake发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
chao应助17861120978采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
1111发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
JamesPei应助lina采纳,获得30
7秒前
NexusExplorer应助逸迩采纳,获得10
7秒前
DearWhite发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
念雪觅梅发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
xccurate完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
天天应助Yan采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Photothermal Science and Techniques 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7724210
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9276953
关于积分的说明 20119462
捐赠科研通 7300758
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3301404
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2454816
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2309047