曲唑酮
文拉法辛
双盲
随机对照试验
重性抑郁障碍
医学
抗抑郁药
盐酸文拉法辛
麻醉
精神科
心理学
内科学
安慰剂
替代医学
焦虑
认知
病理
作者
Andrea Fagiolini,Umberto Albert,Laura Ferrando,Erik Herman,Cosmina Muntean,E. Pálová,Agnese Cattaneo,Alessandro Comandini,Giorgio Di Dato,Giorgio Di Loreto,L. Olivieri,Enrica Salvatori,Serena Tongiani,Siegfried Kasper
标识
DOI:10.1097/yic.0000000000000304
摘要
This double-blind, randomized study evaluated the efficacy and safety of trazodone OAD (once-a-day) in comparison with venlafaxine XR (extended-release) in 324 patients (166 trazodone and 158 venlafaxine) with major depressive disorder (MDD). The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) at week 8. Both treatments were effective in reducing the HAM-D-17 total score at week 8 vs. baseline (intent-to-treat: trazodone –12.9, venlafaxine –14.7; per protocol: trazodone –15.4, venlafaxine –16.4). Patients in the venlafaxine group achieved better results after 8 weeks, whereas the trazodone group achieved a statistically significant reduction in HAM-D-17 following only 7 days of treatment. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were dizziness and somnolence in the trazodone group, and nausea and headache in the venlafaxine group. Most AEs were mild-to-moderate in severity. This study confirmed that both venlafaxine XR and trazodone OAD may represent a valid treatment option for patients with MDD.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI