Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies

作者
Jean Adams,Frances Hillier-Brown,Helen Moore,Amelia A. Lake,Vera Araújo‐Soares,Martin White,Carolyn Summerbell
出处
期刊:Systematic Reviews [BioMed Central]
卷期号:5 (1): 164-164 被引量:493
标识
DOI:10.1186/s13643-016-0337-y
摘要

BACKGROUND: Grey literature includes a range of documents not controlled by commercial publishing organisations. This means that grey literature can be difficult to search and retrieve for evidence synthesis. Much knowledge and evidence in public health, and other fields, accumulates from innovation in practice. This knowledge may not even be of sufficient formality to meet the definition of grey literature. We term this knowledge 'grey information'. Grey information may be even harder to search for and retrieve than grey literature. METHODS: On three previous occasions, we have attempted to systematically search for and synthesise public health grey literature and information-both to summarise the extent and nature of particular classes of interventions and to synthesise results of evaluations. Here, we briefly describe these three 'case studies' but focus on our post hoc critical reflections on searching for and synthesising grey literature and information garnered from our experiences of these case studies. We believe these reflections will be useful to future researchers working in this area. RESULTS: Issues discussed include search methods, searching efficiency, replicability of searches, data management, data extraction, assessing study 'quality', data synthesis, time and resources, and differentiating evidence synthesis from primary research. CONCLUSIONS: Information on applied public health research questions relating to the nature and range of public health interventions, as well as many evaluations of these interventions, may be predominantly, or only, held in grey literature and grey information. Evidence syntheses on these topics need, therefore, to embrace grey literature and information. Many typical systematic review methods for searching, appraising, managing, and synthesising the evidence base can be adapted for use with grey literature and information. Evidence synthesisers should carefully consider the opportunities and problems offered by including grey literature and information. Enhanced incentives for accurate recording and further methodological developments in retrieval will facilitate future syntheses of grey literature and information.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科目三应助zhouyin2采纳,获得10
1秒前
英勇的面包完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
ljqljqljq完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
silin发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
軨鳞完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
燕燕于飞完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
甜甜晓瑶完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2加2完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
所所应助花花草草采纳,获得10
3秒前
SkyChow完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
李健应助曾经很有自信采纳,获得10
4秒前
过时的映安完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
曾俊宇完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
文静的紫萱完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
SciGPT应助zihanShen采纳,获得10
4秒前
研友_ZzaKqn完成签到,获得积分0
5秒前
呆萌的尔云完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Tomma完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
东东完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
自觉的亦竹完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
ok123完成签到 ,获得积分0
7秒前
7秒前
kingwhitewing完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6.4应助szh123采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
淮海路小佩奇完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
隐形采萱完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
晚风完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
arsinagarcc发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders: Interdisciplinary Perspectives 750
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7732976
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9283831
关于积分的说明 20160690
捐赠科研通 7310716
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3304195
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2457076
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2313424