Ethics in nursing: A systematic review of the framework of evidence perspective

奇纳 护理伦理学 护理部 心理信息 系统回顾 包裹体(矿物) 梅德林 能力(人力资源) 医学 护理研究 护士教育 职业道德 工程伦理学 心理学 心理干预 社会心理学 政治学 法学 工程类 精神科
作者
Erman Yıldız
出处
期刊:Nursing Ethics [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:26 (4): 1128-1148 被引量:38
标识
DOI:10.1177/0969733017734412
摘要

Aim: To determine the current state of knowledge on nursing and ethics and to assess the knowledge and experience based on the evidence in this regard. Background: Although ethics is at the center of the nursing profession and the ethical issues affecting nurses are given much importance, few studies have focused on professional ethics in nursing. In this respect, ethics has become a concept that contains controversial and ambiguous situations. Design: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guide, a basic search algorithm, was taken. Data sources: Cochrane, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, and ULAKBIM from 2012 to 2016. Review methods: Following a systematic search strategy, all papers were assessed in relation to inclusion criteria and type of study. When sufficient information was not available in the title and summary of the works, the necessary data were evaluated in full texts. Results: This review was completed with 27 articles meeting the research criteria. The evaluation identified six themes: (1) ethics and nursing, (2) ethical difficulties/ethical dilemmas and nursing, (3) ethical competence and nursing, (4) professional ethics and nursing, (5) ethics, education, and nursing, and (6) ethics in health research. Conclusion: As a result of the review, a synthesis of high evidence-level research relating to nursing ethics was obtained. The emphasis was on the importance of further research and education so that the ethical aspects of nursing can be better understood throughout the studies. Nursing researchers’ level of evidence on ethics and their orientation to high research design will shed light on uncertain and controversial aspects of the subject. Ethical consideration: Since this was a systematic review, no ethical approval was required. There is no conflict of interest in this literature review.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zzt完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
CipherSage的应助被征途采纳,获得10
刚刚
传奇3的应助被aiyouwei采纳,获得10
1秒前
鸣蜩阿六完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
乐乐的应助被小鹿采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
feilong完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
ZHENGXN发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
ABB发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
lll发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
qinhao发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
XI嘻完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
结实的巨人完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
LULU发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
riggy发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
一更关注了科研通微信公众号
4秒前
CipherSage的应助被枫桥夜泊采纳,获得10
5秒前
傲安完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
清脆的一兰完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
隐形曼青的应助被liusx123采纳,获得10
6秒前
清爽晓博发布了新的文献求助80
6秒前
迷人葶发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
唐惠娟完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
Rita完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
hope完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
在水一方的应助被ydz采纳,获得10
6秒前
田様的应助被aa采纳,获得10
6秒前
Bling发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ZHANES发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Akim的应助被STP顶峰相见采纳,获得10
7秒前
黄小小发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
lll完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
陆人甲完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
MEEW发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
CODESSA 2000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Berberine regulates the TLR4 signaling pathway to suppress hypoxia-induced proliferation and migration of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells 520
Organizational Behavior 510
The Welfare Assembly Line: Public Servants in the Suffering City 500
Polymer-based Membranes for Separation and Recovery of Precious Metals 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7850797
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9370519
关于积分的说明 20673616
捐赠科研通 7448123
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3343564
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2486547
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2366638