清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Ethics in nursing: A systematic review of the framework of evidence perspective

奇纳 护理伦理学 护理部 心理信息 系统回顾 包裹体(矿物) 梅德林 能力(人力资源) 医学 护理研究 护士教育 职业道德 工程伦理学 心理学 心理干预 社会心理学 政治学 法学 工程类 精神科
作者
Erman Yıldız
出处
期刊:Nursing Ethics [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:26 (4): 1128-1148 被引量:29
标识
DOI:10.1177/0969733017734412
摘要

Aim: To determine the current state of knowledge on nursing and ethics and to assess the knowledge and experience based on the evidence in this regard. Background: Although ethics is at the center of the nursing profession and the ethical issues affecting nurses are given much importance, few studies have focused on professional ethics in nursing. In this respect, ethics has become a concept that contains controversial and ambiguous situations. Design: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guide, a basic search algorithm, was taken. Data sources: Cochrane, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, and ULAKBIM from 2012 to 2016. Review methods: Following a systematic search strategy, all papers were assessed in relation to inclusion criteria and type of study. When sufficient information was not available in the title and summary of the works, the necessary data were evaluated in full texts. Results: This review was completed with 27 articles meeting the research criteria. The evaluation identified six themes: (1) ethics and nursing, (2) ethical difficulties/ethical dilemmas and nursing, (3) ethical competence and nursing, (4) professional ethics and nursing, (5) ethics, education, and nursing, and (6) ethics in health research. Conclusion: As a result of the review, a synthesis of high evidence-level research relating to nursing ethics was obtained. The emphasis was on the importance of further research and education so that the ethical aspects of nursing can be better understood throughout the studies. Nursing researchers’ level of evidence on ethics and their orientation to high research design will shed light on uncertain and controversial aspects of the subject. Ethical consideration: Since this was a systematic review, no ethical approval was required. There is no conflict of interest in this literature review.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
Kevin完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
草莓熊1215完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
江三村完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
2分钟前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
四十四次日落完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
雪山飞龙完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
3分钟前
axiao发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
月亮煮粥发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
poki完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
月亮煮粥完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
laber完成签到,获得积分0
4分钟前
5分钟前
PGao应助sino-ft采纳,获得10
6分钟前
laber给爱学习的小霸的求助进行了留言
6分钟前
星辰大海应助满意的世界采纳,获得10
6分钟前
泽锦臻完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
胖小羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
liwang9301完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
8分钟前
LZQ完成签到,获得积分0
8分钟前
小张发布了新的文献求助10
8分钟前
英俊的铭应助小张采纳,获得10
8分钟前
nojego完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
小张完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
樂點完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
自然之水完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
9分钟前
earthai完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
9分钟前
芝麻汤圆完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
NexusExplorer应助满意的世界采纳,获得10
9分钟前
习月阳完成签到,获得积分10
10分钟前
xun完成签到,获得积分20
10分钟前
钟D摆完成签到 ,获得积分10
10分钟前
111完成签到 ,获得积分10
10分钟前
hongt05完成签到 ,获得积分10
11分钟前
高分求助中
Mass producing individuality 600
Разработка метода ускоренного контроля качества электрохромных устройств 500
A Combined Chronic Toxicity and Carcinogenicity Study of ε-Polylysine in the Rat 400
Advances in Underwater Acoustics, Structural Acoustics, and Computational Methodologies 300
Effect of deresuscitation management vs. usual care on ventilator-free days in patients with abdominal septic shock 200
Erectile dysfunction From bench to bedside 200
Advanced Introduction to Behavioral Law and Economics 200
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3825014
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3367346
关于积分的说明 10445264
捐赠科研通 3086704
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1698210
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 816657
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 769907