亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

731

医学 泮托拉唑 法莫替丁 机械通风 应激性溃疡 内科学 临床终点 随机对照试验 不利影响 胃肠病学 麻醉 奥美拉唑
作者
Benjamin Wee,Cheuk Hei Liu,Henry Cohen,Stephen Kravchuk,Kiran Reddy,Rajat Mukherji
出处
期刊:Critical Care Medicine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:41: A181-A181 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1097/01.ccm.0000439969.36301.c9
摘要

Introduction: There is a paucity of trials studying the role of intravenous (IV) proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in the critically ill, and no trials comparing pantoprazole to famotidine, two commonly used agents for SUP. Methods: This is an ongoing prospective, open-label, randomized study of patients admitted to the ICU/CCU from January 2013 and onward. All patients are assessed for risk factors for stress-related mucosal bleeding (SRMB). Patients are randomized to famotidine 20 mg IV Q12H or pantoprazole 40 mg IV QAM. The primary endpoint is the incidence of overt and clinically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding (CSUGB) until the patient is either transferred out of the ICU/CCU or expired. Secondary endpoints include length of stay (LOS), duration on mechanical ventilation, and drug-induced adverse drug events. Results: Patients were randomized to IV pantoprazole (n=68) and IV famotidine (n=61) with a median patient age of 72 years. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics including risk factors for SRMB (2.7 vs. 2.7, p=0.50), however the pantoprazole group had higher APACHE-II scores (23.9 vs. 20.1, p<0.01). The most common SRMB risk factors for pantoprazole and famotidine were mechanical ventilation (79.4% vs. 75.4%), acute renal failure (36.8% vs. 49.2%), coagulopathy (32.4% vs. 32.8%), and septic shock (33.8% vs. 27.9%). SRMB occurred in four patients in the pantoprazole group (3 overt bleeds, p=0.36 and 1 CSUGB, p=0.34) and one patient in the famotidine group (overt bleed). Patients given IV pantoprazole had similar mean ICU/CCU LOS (6.7 vs. 6.5 days, p=0.37) and duration on mechanical ventilation (6.5 vs. 6.3 days, p=0.39). Patients on pantoprazole (n=22) experienced more adverse effects than famotidine (n=10); hypomagnesemia (13 vs. 5) and nausea/vomiting (7 vs. 3); C. difficile diarrhea was the same in both groups (2 vs. 2). Conclusions: IV pantoprazole and IV famotidine are equally effective for SUP; however, more patients had UGB with pantoprazole indicating the plausible need for more frequent dosing. Pantoprazole was commonly associated with hypomagnesemia; questioning the prevailing belief that hypomagnesemia generally occurs only with chronic PPI use. The study is ongoing and will determine the efficacy and safety between both agents for SUP in the critical care setting.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
负责元瑶完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
4秒前
6秒前
9秒前
10秒前
12秒前
14秒前
14秒前
17秒前
20秒前
22秒前
boboo发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
整齐的天问完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
27秒前
怕孤独的涵双完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
30秒前
33秒前
35秒前
37秒前
37秒前
40秒前
42秒前
45秒前
47秒前
50秒前
53秒前
55秒前
58秒前
58秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
iman完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
IRTSD: Open-Source Data and Toolset for Electromagnetic Transient Analysis of Disturbances and IBR Control Malfunctions in Transmission Systems 1000
Entre Praga y Madrid : los contactos checoslovaco-españoles (1948-1977) 600
Les Mots du discours 600
A Consideration on Use of Material Grades for Hull Structural Members Based on Fracture Toughness(Second Report) 500
AI Disclosure in Annual Reports: Evolution, Determinants, and Capital Market Participants’ Perceptions 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8115277
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9521406
关于积分的说明 21533531
捐赠科研通 7693499
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3413534
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2539837
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2453572