医学
镇静
咪唑安定
异丙酚
麻醉
心房颤动
全身麻醉
烧蚀
芬太尼
四分位间距
心脏消融
低温消融
导管消融
外科
心脏病学
作者
Rodrigue Garcia,Victor Waldmann,Philippe Vanduynhoven,Martina Nesti,Márcio Jansen de Oliveira Figueiredo,Kumar Narayanan,Giulio Conte,María José Guerra Palmero,Serge Bovéda,David Duncker
出处
期刊:Europace
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2021-05-25
卷期号:23 (12): 2039-2045
被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1093/europace/euab154
摘要
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has become one of the most common procedures in the electrophysiology lab with rapidly increasing volumes. Peri-procedural anaesthesia for AF ablation varies between centres, from general anaesthesia to deep or conscious sedation. The aim of this survey was to assess current sedation practices for AF ablation worldwide and its evolution over the last decade. Centres regularly performing AF ablation responded to an online survey. A total of 297 centres participated in the survey. Overall, the median (interquartile range) number of AF ablation procedures increased from 91 (43-200) to 200 (74-350) per year (P < 0.001) between 2010 and 2019. The proportion of cryoablation also increased from 17.0% to 33.2% (P < 0.001). In 2019, the most used sedation technique was general anaesthesia (40.5%), followed by conscious sedation (32.0%) and deep sedation (27.5%). Between 2010 and 2019, the proportion of procedures performed under general anaesthesia (+4.4%; P = 0.02) and deep sedation (+4.8%; P < 0.01) increased, whereas the use of conscious sedation decreased (-9.2%; P < 0.001). The most commonly used hypnotic drugs were propofol and midazolam, whereas the most commonly used opioid drugs were remifentanyl and fentanyl. This worldwide survey shows that the number of AF ablation procedures has more than doubled over the last decade and general anaesthesia remains most commonly used. Studies comparing outcomes between different sedation strategies are needed to guide optimal decision-making.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI