From Formative Assessment to Assessment for Learning: A Path to Success in Standards-Based Schools:

基于标准的评估 终结性评价 医学教育 教育评估 高等教育 计算机科学 课程 标准化测试
作者
Richard J. Stiggins
出处
期刊:Phi Delta Kappan [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:87 (4): 324-328 被引量:296
标识
DOI:10.1177/003172170508700414
摘要

SOCIETY HAS SEEN fit to redefine the role of its schools. No longer are they to be places that merely sort and rank students according to their achievement. Now, they are to be places where all students become competent, where all students meet pre-specified standards and so are not left behind. With increasing intensity, policy makers are turning to assessment as the power tool that will compel schools to fulfill this new role. If we look closely at the union of this redefined mission and the growing reliance on assessment, we can find a surprising and immensely powerful way to use assessment in the development of effective schools. Traditionally, schools have used assessment--the pending final exam, the unannounced pop quiz, and the threat of low or failing report card grades--to motivate students. To maximize learning, our teachers believed, maximize anxiety. Assessment has served as the great intimidator. Pressure to get high test scores and good grades, it was believed, would motivate greater effort and thus more learning. The recent change in the mission of schools has clouded this traditional view of the relationship between assessment and motivation. To see how and why, we must explore our assessment legacy and its motivational intricacies. As you will see, through that retrospective, we will discover a far more productive way for assessment to help students succeed. THE OLD MISSION AND ITS LEGACY Today's adults grew up in schools designed to sort us into the various segments of our social and economic system. The amount of time available to learn was fixed: one year per grade. The amount learned by the end of that time was free to vary: some of us learned a great deal; some, very little. As we advanced through the grades, those who had learned a great deal in previous grades continued to build on those foundations. Those who had failed to master the early prerequisites within the allotted time failed to learn that which followed. After 12 or 13 years of cumulative treatment of this kind, we were, in effect, spread along an achievement continuum that was ultimately reflected in each student's rank in class upon graduation. From the very earliest grades, some students learned a great deal very quickly and consistently scored high on assessments. The emotional effect of this was to help them to see themselves as capable learners, and so these students became increasingly confident in school. That confidence gave them the inner emotional strength to take the risk of striving for more success because they believed that success was within their reach. Driven forward by this optimism, these students continued to try hard, and that effort continued to result in success for them. They became the academic and emotional winners. Notice that the trigger for their emotional strength and their learning success was their perception of their success on formal and informal assessments. But there were other students who didn't fare so well. They scored very low on tests, beginning in the earliest grades. The emotional effect was to cause them to question their own capabilities as learners. They began to lose confidence, which, in turn, deprived them of the emotional reserves needed to continue to take risks. Public failure was embarrassing, and it seemed better not to try and thus to save face. As their motivation waned, of course, their performance plummeted. These students embarked on what they believed to be an irreversible slide toward inevitable failure and lost hope. Once again, the emotional trigger for their decision not to try was their perception of their performance on assessments. Consider the reality--indeed, the paradox--of the schools in which we were reared. If some students worked hard and learned a lot, that was a positive result, and they would finish high in the rank order. But if some students gave up in hopeless failure, that was an acceptable result, too, because they would occupy places very low in the rank order. …
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
橘如发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI2S应助徐晓婧采纳,获得60
6秒前
cs完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
9秒前
rush完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
文艺鹰完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
15秒前
orixero应助张张采纳,获得10
16秒前
Z赵完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
顾矜应助阳光的蜜蜂啊采纳,获得10
18秒前
学勾巴发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
12完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
xx发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
lxcy0612发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
旅行者完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
智海瑞完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
搞怪的香菇完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
Layover完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
小刘完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
小蘑菇应助终生科研徒刑采纳,获得10
28秒前
耐斯糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
爆米花应助雪满头采纳,获得10
31秒前
Ran完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
阿湛完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
子春完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
tom关注了科研通微信公众号
34秒前
team完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
07关注了科研通微信公众号
36秒前
隐形曼青应助学勾巴采纳,获得10
37秒前
科研通AI5应助胡萝卜叶子采纳,获得10
38秒前
Akim应助xx采纳,获得10
40秒前
LDDDGR发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
Orange应助cookie486采纳,获得10
47秒前
zks完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
高分求助中
Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics 2nd edition 888
Introduction to Strong Mixing Conditions Volumes 1-3 500
Tip60 complex regulates eggshell formation and oviposition in the white-backed planthopper, providing effective targets for pest control 400
Optical and electric properties of monocrystalline synthetic diamond irradiated by neutrons 320
共融服務學習指南 300
Essentials of Pharmacoeconomics: Health Economics and Outcomes Research 3rd Edition. by Karen Rascati 300
Peking Blues // Liao San 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3801430
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3347140
关于积分的说明 10332081
捐赠科研通 3063446
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1681691
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 807670
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 763843