How Effective Are Nonsurgical Interventions for Work-Related Shoulder Pain? A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

作者
Philippe Meidinger,Marc-Olivier Dubé,Tobias Saueressig,Martine Gagnon,Anthony Lachance,Eve‐Line Bussières,Jean‐Sébastien Roy
出处
期刊:Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy [American Physical Therapy Association]
卷期号:55 (11): 705-718
标识
DOI:10.2519/jospt.2025.13360
摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of nonsurgical interventions for work-related shoulder pain. DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Six databases and 2 clinical trial registries were searched, supplemented by manual searches and citation tracking. Eligible trials compared nonsurgical interventions for work-related shoulder pain. DATA SYNTHESIS: Outcomes of interest were pain intensity, physical functioning, return to work, and productivity loss. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0; certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. A random-effects meta-analysis and narrative synthesis were performed. RESULTS: Of 8608 records identified, 24 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Four trials were included in meta-analysis. No trials were at low risk of bias. The evidence was very uncertain (GRADE) regarding the effect of exercises interventions (eg, strengthening, stretching, and endurance exercises) compared to no intervention on short-term pain intensity (standardized mean difference, –0.60; 95% confidence interval: –1.22, 0.03; 95% prediction interval: –1.83, 0.64; k = 4; n = 172). Reanalyzing using 3 alternative meta-analysis approaches for small-study meta-analyses yielded different results. The narrative synthesis provided no additional insights. CONCLUSION: The evidence was very uncertain about whether exercise interventions (strengthening, stretching, and endurance) provided a moderate short-term (<3 months) benefit for reducing pain compared with no intervention. These results should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited number of trials included in the meta-analysis and the inconsistent terminology for work-related shoulder pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(11):705-718. Epub 3 October 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13360

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
冷水鱼完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
JamesPei应助之之采纳,获得10
1秒前
wang@163.com完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
文静的蜗牛完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
lan发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
桃子酱完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
Orisol发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Owen应助豆豆兜兜转转采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
lz完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
香蕉觅云应助yangy115采纳,获得10
2秒前
宏哥完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
曾经的含烟完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研菜鸟望毕业完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Hello应助儒雅的渊思采纳,获得10
3秒前
Hui完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
轻松的薯片完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
今后应助3336929526采纳,获得10
4秒前
地球发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
67完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Harden完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
饭后瞌睡完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Marine吃苹果完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
大摸特摸完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
稳重的安萱完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Jack完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
刘传宏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
放大镜发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
菠萝吹雪完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
yh完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
晚来雪完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
maxiaole完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
高分求助中
On lateral buckling of armouring wires in flexible pipes 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 700
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7744779
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9292634
关于积分的说明 20215027
捐赠科研通 7323931
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3307703
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2459678
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2318799