医学
瘢痕疙瘩
系统回顾
心理干预
皮肤病科
增生性瘢痕
增生性瘢痕
梅德林
重症监护医学
外科
精神科
政治学
法学
疤痕
作者
Karina Jackson,Alyona G Lee,Nabeel Ahmad,Harrison P. Nguyen
摘要
This systematic review compares the efficacy of pressure garment therapy (PGT) and non-PGT treatments, such as triamcinolone, verapamil, and laser therapies, for hypertrophic and keloid scars. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted. Studies that evaluated the efficacy of PGT or non-PGT interventions using standardized scar assessment scales (VSS, POSAS) were included. A total of 753 articles were screened, and 12 studies involving 397 participants met the inclusion criteria. Interventions on the VSS scale compared included PGT, triamcinolone, verapamil, bleomycin, silicone gel, laser therapy, Botulinum toxin, and massage therapy. Triamcinolone showed the greatest scar reduction (82.2%), followed by Nd:YAG laser (65.44%) and verapamil (57.7%). Early intervention PGT demonstrated a 30.2% reduction, while late intervention PGT showed only a 4.5% decrease. Triamcinolone is the most effective treatment for hypertrophic and keloid scars, but evidence supporting PGT is inconsistent. Further research is needed to standardize treatment protocols and improve clinical outcomes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI